09/24/2026
I HAVE A QUESTION.
Actually, I have about $200,000 worth of questions.
Apparently, somewhere along the way, we needed a major grant-funded study and consulting process to discover something most people living and working in Prescott could have told us for free:
IT'S EXPENSIVE TO LIVE HERE.
Shocking, I know.
For $200,000, somebody could have called me.
I would have gladly explained that I regularly hear from people who can't afford their rent, groceries, gas or childcare.
Call our local employers.
They'll tell you how difficult it is to find good employees who can actually afford to live in the community where they work.
Call our food pantries and nonprofits and ask them about the demand they're seeing.
Call a teacher.
Call a healthcare worker.
Call someone working in a restaurant.
Call a young family.
Call basically anyone trying to live on a normal paycheck in Prescott.
I think we could have established that there was a housing problem before lunch.
Now, to be fair, the approximately $200,000 wasn't simply spent to determine that housing is expensive.
The City received state grant funding for a much larger process involving research, consulting, strategies, potential policy and zoning recommendations, an implementation roadmap and other work intended to help address workforce housing.
Great.
So here's where I start asking questions.
WHAT DID WE ACTUALLY GET FOR IT?
The City created the Workforce Housing Committee in 2022.
We had meetings.
We had discussions.
We hired consultants.
We conducted a housing needs assessment.
We developed a Workforce Housing Policy Framework.
We developed a Workforce Housing Strategy and Implementation Plan.
We confirmed that housing is expensive.
Check.
Then in April 2026, City Council voted 5-2 to dissolve the Workforce Housing Committee.
Wait...
What?
We spent years studying the problem, gathered community input, developed recommendations, created an implementation strategy...
And then dissolved the committee?
Maybe I'm missing something.
Seriously.
If I am, someone please explain it to me.
Because I don't want to unfairly criticize something if there is an actual implementation process happening behind the scenes.
So let's ask some very simple questions:
What recommendations were actually implemented?
What policies changed?
What recommendations are still moving forward?
What measurable results have come from this work?
Who is responsible for workforce housing now that the committee is gone?
And most importantly...
WHERE ARE THE SOLUTIONS?
Because I'm pretty sure the family struggling to make rent doesn't need another 100-page report explaining why they're struggling to make rent.
They already know.
The business owner losing employees because they can't afford to live here already knows.
The young person wondering whether they can build a life in Prescott already knows.
The senior struggling with rising costs already knows.
We don't have a shortage of studies.
We have a shortage of solutions.
And before someone says, "Well, it's complicated..."
Of course it's complicated.
Housing involves land costs, construction costs, zoning, infrastructure, wages, interest rates, property rights, development regulations and about 100 other things.
That's exactly why I want to know what happened to the SOLUTIONS that all this research was supposed to help develop.
Maybe there is a perfectly good answer.
I genuinely hope there is.
So let's hear it.
City of Prescott.
Current Council.
Former Council.
Former Workforce Housing Committee members.
Local developers.
Employers.
Residents.
Tell us:
What did we accomplish?
What are we implementing?
What didn't work?
And what happens next?
Because Prescott's workforce housing problem didn't magically disappear when we dissolved the committee studying it.
Funny how that works.
I'm going to dig deeper into the contracts, expenditures, recommendations and implementation plan.
Maybe we'll discover that the $200,000 produced meaningful changes that are happening right now.
I hope that's exactly what we find.
But if we spent years studying a problem everyone already knew existed, developed a plan to address it, and then put that plan on a shelf...
Well...
I think that's a conversation taxpayers deserve to have. San Martin Rodriguez