04/29/2025
Alma 32:33 teaches that “[God] imparteth his word by angels unto men, yea, not only men but women also”. To some people, this may seem to be at odds with the fact that overall, the Book of Mormon does not seem to place a focus on women. Many of these concerns come from the lack of female representation and the frequent use of masculine-focused language in the Book of Mormon.
The critique of the Book of Mormon primarily using masculine-focused language (man, men, mankind, brethren, etc.) is not unfounded, but comes from a modern interpretation of those words. Perhaps this text is not as exclusionary as it may seem.
Focusing on Alma the Younger and his sermons, he addresses his people as “brethren” and only specifically acknowledges women 5 times. To modern-day readers, this seems to clearly be exclusionary to women. While today, we may be accustomed to “brothers and sisters” or “people” to encompass a mixed audience, 200 years ago the term “brethren” was used and understood to apply to both men and women in certain situations.
Additionally, using the word “brethren” carries a more personal tone than “people”. In Mosiah 29 when King Mosiah is issuing a proclamation to his subjects, he begins by saying “Behold, O ye my people, or my brethren, for I esteem you as such”, here “brethren” is used to esteem his subjects and is not excluding anyone from the group he had just called his “people”.
Like with King Mosiah, in these chapters “my people” as a way to refer to a group of individuals is used for kings and their subjects, so it connotes rulership and superiority. Alma himself never calls his audience his “people”, and opts to call them his “brethren”, likely to communicate that they are equals as he renounced his chief judgeship.
When there is no possessive pronoun before “people” in these chapters, it is almost exclusively referring to the people being talked about, not the people being talked to. So again, “brethren” implies a closeness and familiarity that “people” does not.
With this understanding, we see that the Book of Mormon is more inclusive of women than it may appear at first. In addition to specific references and addresses to women, many words which we would understand today to be exclusionary actually refer to all people. So perhaps the exclusion comes from our interpretation rather than the text itself.
From Not Only Men but For Women Also: An Argument for Alma’s International Inclusion of Women by Cassidy Nichole Pyper.
Cassidy Nichole Pyper’s Not Only Men but Women Also: An Argument for Alma’s International Inclusion of Women explores possible ways to reframe and understand the seemingly gender-exclusionary language in the Book of Mormon as inclusive. Read the full article on our website.