08/25/2026
This one hits on something I think we need to talk about more in youth sports.
I love competitive sports. I love watching kids work hard, chase goals, and push themselves. And I absolutely believe travel programs have a place.
But when travel becomes the expectation instead of an option, we have a problem.
When families feel like their child has to travel at 7, 8, or 9 years old just to keep up⦠when development becomes tied to how much a family can spend⦠when rec programs lose resources because everyone is being pushed toward the next āeliteā opportunity⦠we have to ask who this system is actually serving.
Especially in hockey, a sport that already has a massive financial barrier to entry, we should be working toward more ways to play, not fewer. š
There should be room for the kid chasing the highest level of competition AND the kid who just wants to play hockey with their friends every week.
Development doesnāt have to mean specialization.
Competitive doesnāt have to mean professionalizing childhood.
And more expensive doesnāt automatically mean better.
Sometimes the best thing we can do to grow a sport is simply give more kids a place to play it.
This article is definitely worth the read, especially for parents, coaches, and anyone involved in youth sports.
āTravel sports,ā a term that has come to encompass all sorts of private teams, leagues, and clubs, used to be for the truly exceptional young athlete. Now, theyāre for anyone willing to pay ā an expensive, exhausting commitment that has become popular not necessarily because millions of parents want them for their children but because it can feel like thereās no other choice. Rec programs are underfunded and struggle to compete with for-profit leagues for prime field, rink, and court times. And the level of play is diluted, often very early, as travel teams are incentivized to enroll children at young ages.
Around 5 million children in the U.S. now compete on travel teams. Parents find themselves trapped. They know the benefits of sports and want that for their children, yet giving it to them often means buying into a sports ecosystem thatās inherently flawed. As the pay-to-play model increasingly takes hold, so does the idea that kids should start competing at younger and younger ages, risking their sense of self along with their shoulders and ACLs.
āI never want my kids to look back and say I didnāt do everything I could to help them live their dreams,ā a mother of three soccer players said. Sheās hired professional photographers to take action shots for her 12- and 13-year-oldsā Instagram accounts ā the platform has become a recruiting tool ā and theyāve both asked her to pay for personal trainers.
āI think the word isnāt āspecializeā; you are āprofessionalizingā your kid early. You are exposing them to everything professionals have to deal with ā Iām talking injury, time, schedule, everything,ā said John Van Benschoten, a former MLB player and travel-baseball coach.
It makes one ask: All this for what? And for whom? Read Caitlin Moscatelloās cover story on how travel leagues have made youth sports more expensive, hypercompetitive, and all-consuming ā and the investors who are making a killing: https://nymag.visitlink.me/fEw_Lb