05/08/2023
Incumbent Councilman Michael Ballard paid for and oversaw a mailing that intentionally obfuscated his identity unlike any prior mailings he sent to residents before.
The law is clear.
"False disclaimers"/concealing the identity of a political mailing "constitutes misrepresentation."
On election day, remember that your elected officials conduct tells you all you need to know about their character and lack of integrity.
It is interesting ignores this and blocks or ignores residents asking questions about it.
intends to denigrate residents asking legitimate questions like this, labeling them attack/dogs for the other candidates or insinuating this is "bully" behavior.
Simply for asking what our elected officials are doing by anonymously mailing us propaganda pieces to manipulate election outcomes.
All because one resident is demanding public accountability from his local elected official...
_________________
11 CFR § 110.16 - Prohibitions on fraudulent misrepresentations.
§ 110.16 Prohibitions on fraudulent misrepresentations.
(a) In general. No person who is a candidate for Federal office or an employee or agent of such a candidate shall—
(1) Fraudulently misrepresent the person or any committee or organization under the person's control as speaking or writing or otherwise acting for or on behalf of any other candidate or political party or employee or agent thereof in a matter which is damaging to such other candidate or political party or employee or agent thereof; or
(2) Willfully and knowingly participate in or conspire to participate in any plan, scheme, or design to violate paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/11/110.16
_________________
“public communication” includes a “mass mailing,” which is defined as more than 500 pieces of substantially similar mail. 2 U.S.C. 431(22), (23). Section 441d(a) refers to a “mailing,” without any numerical minimum. Congress, through BCRA, removed the pre-BCRA reference to a “direct mailing” (emphasis added).
The Commission has determined that “on a matter that is damaging” includes actions or spoken or written communications that are intended to suppress votes for the candidate or party who has been fraudulently misrepresented. A violation of section 441h(a) does not depend on whether the candidate or party who is fraudulently represented goes on to win an election.""
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2002/12/13/02-31521/disclaimers-fraudulent-solicitation-civil-penalties-and-personal-use-of-campaign-funds