The Southwest Virginia Free Press

The Southwest Virginia Free Press The Southwest Virginia Free Press is dedicated to being a voice for the voiceless. We pride ourselves on truthful, accurate reporting.

The Russell County Free Press is a community-based and personally funded news outlet for residents of Southwest Virginia. If you have a story reach out to me, I will keep you anonymous and write with integrity.

What Tate’s Data Center Gamble Means for Russell CountyTate, a global supplier of infrastructure for data centers and co...
12/13/2025

What Tate’s Data Center Gamble Means for Russell County

Tate, a global supplier of infrastructure for data centers and commercial buildings, has quickly become one of the most significant new industrial players in Russell County. The company is investing millions of dollars in facilities in St. Paul and Lebanon, tying coalfield communities to the digital backbone that powers cloud computing and artificial intelligence.

State and local officials describe the projects as a manufacturing revival. For a region that has lived through generations of boom‑and‑bust promises, the public deserves a clear look at how much money is on the table, what is being promised in return, and how this fits into a wider pattern of subsidized projects that have not always delivered.

Who Tate Is and What It Makes

Tate is a Maryland‑headquartered manufacturer that designs and builds raised access floors, airflow‑management products, modular aisle containment, structural ceilings, and related systems. These products are used in mission‑critical data centers and large commercial buildings.

Inside a modern data center, Tate’s systems help route power and cabling under raised floors, control airflow around server racks, and improve cooling efficiency. The company operates within Kingspan’s data‑solutions division and serves hyperscale cloud operators, colocation providers, and enterprise data centers across North America and other regions.

The St. Paul Facility: A $14.9 Million Bet and 170 Jobs

In late 2023, state officials announced that Tate would invest about 14.9 million dollars to establish a new manufacturing facility in Russell County. The plant is located in the former Bush building in St. Paul and is focused primarily on manufacturing components and containment products for data‑center customers in Virginia and elsewhere.

The project was unveiled with a headline promise of 170 new jobs, making it one of the largest manufacturing commitments in the coalfield region in years. A state workforce‑development initiative has been tasked with providing customized recruiting and training to help Tate staff the facility, working in partnership with community colleges and other education providers.

Regional economic‑development leaders have highlighted the St. Paul project as part of an emerging “Data Center Ridge” strategy. The idea is that, while the servers and massive power loads remain concentrated in Northern Virginia, Southwest Virginia can capture manufacturing, support, and back‑office roles that serve the same industry.

The Lebanon Expansion: A Second Plant and More Public Support

In late 2025, Tate announced a second major move in Russell County: the acquisition and occupation of a roughly 131,000‑square‑foot former Alcoa manufacturing building in Lebanon. The facility sits on about 11 acres along U.S. 19 and includes a large open manufacturing floor, office space, and multiple docks and overhead doors.

The building has been acquired and renovated through a collaboration led by the Russell County Industrial Development Authority and regional economic‑development financiers. Tate plans to lease the upgraded space and begin operations there, with the company and local leaders projecting roughly three dozen additional full‑time jobs over the next few years.

Officials are framing this expansion as confirmation that the initial St. Paul investment is working. They present Tate’s growing footprint as proof that Russell County can be a long‑term hub for data‑center infrastructure manufacturing rather than a one‑off announcement.

How Much Public Money Is in the Deal?

While Tate is bringing private capital and jobs, the projects are also backed by substantial public support.

For the St. Paul facility, the commonwealth awarded a significant performance‑based grant from a statewide opportunity fund to assist the county with the project. The regional tobacco‑revitalization commission approved an additional grant tied to the same facility. On top of that, several years earlier, a coalfield economic‑development authority provided multi‑million‑dollar financing that allowed the Russell County Industrial Development Authority to purchase and prepare the St. Paul building. The same authority has also approved workforce‑development and training funds specifically for Tate.

For the Lebanon expansion, the county industrial authority acquired and renovated the former Alcoa building using new financing from the same regional lender, again backed by public programs created to spur investment in distressed communities. Tate will lease a facility that has effectively been upgraded at public expense, in exchange for a commitment to operate there and create jobs.

In addition to these grants and loans, Tate is eligible for state‑supported workforce assistance and potentially other tax incentives commonly offered to manufacturers. Not all of these supports are fully itemized in public summaries, but taken together they represent a layered stack of public investment underwriting a private manufacturer’s expansion.

What’s Actually Happening on the Ground?

Tate’s St. Paul facility has begun operations, producing data‑center components and hiring for a range of technical and production roles. Job postings and local updates describe openings for quality, maintenance, mechanical and electrical technicians, paint and laser technicians, and other skilled positions.

The renovated Lebanon facility is slated to begin operations as Tate ramps up its manufacturing capacity there. Regional officials have praised Tate as a “good employer” and a “strong partner,” emphasizing the company’s wages, benefits, and potential to diversify an economy long dominated by coal and related industries.

So far, the narrative presented by officials is one of steady progress: buildings that sat under‑used are being brought back to life, and a global company is betting on small coalfield towns as part of its North American strategy.

Public Money, Private Risk: A Familiar Pattern

Tate’s arrival is a real development story, but it is also part of a familiar pattern. Over the past two decades, public entities across Southwest and Southside Virginia have poured millions of dollars into industrial parks, factory renovations, workforce‑training grants, and direct incentives for companies that promised jobs.

Some of those projects have taken root. Others have not. Residents can point to shuttered plants that once came with big headlines, empty or half‑built industrial sites, and smaller firms that accepted public funds before quietly closing or leaving. In several cases, companies fell far short of job promises or shut down within a few years, leaving taxpayers responsible for the debt on buildings, infrastructure, and site work.
Because these deals are spread across multiple programs and jurisdictions, there is no single, simple number that captures how many subsidized projects have failed or under‑performed. What does exist, in public audits and investigative reporting, is a consistent set of concerns: weak clawback provisions when companies miss targets, limited transparency around deal terms, and a tendency to prioritize splashy announcements over patient support for local entrepreneurs.

In that context, Tate’s projects are not inherently a problem. But they are a reminder that any time public funds underwrite private risk, residents have a right—and a responsibility—to ask hard questions.

A Region That Deserves Full Transparency

Residents of Russell County and surrounding communities have every reason to welcome new manufacturing jobs and to celebrate when global companies choose to invest in the coalfields. They also have every right to demand clear answers about how public money is used and how success will be measured over the long haul.

Tate’s investments in St. Paul and Lebanon have the potential to become a cornerstone of a more diverse local economy, supporting families and helping the region participate in a global digital‑infrastructure boom. They also have the potential, if not carefully monitored, to become one more line on a long list of projects that looked better on paper than they did in practice.

The difference will depend not only on Tate’s business decisions but on how seriously local and state leaders take their responsibility to monitor outcomes, enforce agreements, and report honestly to the public. In a county that has been promised transformation many times before, that kind of transparency is not a luxury—it is the minimum standard taxpayers should expect.

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1165703552406532&id=100069006946224

Tate, a Kingspan company and global leader in mission-critical data center infrastructure solutions, has announced an expansion of its U.S. manufacturing operations with the acquisition of a 131,000-square-foot facility in Lebanon, VA.

Tate will occupy the former Alcoa manufacturing building, which has been acquired and renovated through a collaborative effort led by the Russell County Industrial Development Authority (IDA) and the Virginia Coalfield Economic Development Authority (VCEDA).

Earlier this year, VCEDA approved an up to $4 million loan enabling the IDA to purchase and prepare the building at 705 Regional Park Road for new industrial use, after which Tate will lease the upgraded facility. Located just 18 miles from the company’s existing St. Paul site, the Lebanon location expands Tate’s North American production footprint, strengthens manufacturing resiliency, and is expected to create up to 35 new full-time jobs within three years.

Read more: https://vceda.us/tate-expands-u-s-manufacturing-footprint-bringing-new-jobs-to-russell-county/

12/05/2025

A coating of snow in the town of Lebanon, VA this morning.
From Jeremy Hill via Chime In.

12/05/2025

All Southwest locations are operating on a 2-hour delay on Friday, December 5, 2025. Details at: https://go.sw.edu/weather

12/04/2025

From November 20 to Now: How Virginia Fumbled the Travis Turner Case

On November 20, 2025, Union High School’s undefeated football coach, Travis Turner, walked into the woods near his Appalachia home with a gun and never came back. Two weeks later, Southwest Virginia is still searching for answers about where he went – and why Virginia State Police downplayed the danger he posed to the community even after he was wanted on serious felony charges.

Turner’s disappearance began like a straightforward missing‑person case. His family says that on the evening of Thursday, November 20, he left his house to walk in the nearby mountains carrying a firearm and did not return. When his wife contacted law enforcement that night, she was reportedly told she would have to wait at least 24 hours before a missing‑person report could be taken. On Friday, November 21, she filed that report with Virginia State Police, and searches of the rugged terrain around their home began in earnest.

Over the weekend of November 22–23, local residents watched troopers, bloodhounds and drones comb the hillsides while news outlets reported that the beloved coach of a 12–0 Union team was missing. By November 23, Turner had been entered into the state’s missing‑persons database, and VSP publicly confirmed that they were looking for him. Officials emphasized that agents from the Bureau of Criminal Investigation had been headed to his home on November 20 “as part of an investigation, not to arrest him,” and said he was gone by the time they arrived.

That timing is one of the key questions in this case. On November 20, agents are in transit to speak with Turner as part of a criminal investigation. On that same day, according to his family’s attorney, he leaves his residence and walks into the woods with a firearm, never to return. No arrest warrants had been issued yet, but a state‑level investigation was active and serious enough to send special agents to his front door. The public has a right to ask whether word of that impending contact – or of the broader investigation – reached Turner before law enforcement did.

The situation escalated quietly behind the scenes. On Tuesday, November 25, Virginia State Police obtained ten arrest warrants for Turner: five counts tied to child s*xual abuse material and five counts of using a computer to solicit a minor. That same day, they publicly announced the charges and labeled him a fugitive from justice. Yet even then, the official line continued to reassure people that there was no threat to the community, despite the fact that Turner had been missing for five days, that he had last been seen with a gun in the mountains, and that he was now wanted on multiple felonies involving children.

From November 26 through November 28, the manhunt continued across Wise County. Reporting on November 26 noted that it had been one week since Turner was last seen. Virginia State Police acknowledged using air support, K‑9 units and search teams, but there was still no clear, urgent public warning along the lines of: “An armed, wanted suspect is missing in this area – do not approach and call 911 if seen.” Instead, parents, students and residents were left to fill in the gaps through rumor, social media and fragmented coverage from different outlets.

By the weekend of November 29–30, national media had picked up the story, no longer as a missing‑coach human‑interest piece but as a manhunt for a coach now charged with child s*xual abuse‑related offenses. On November 30, the U.S. Marshals Service announced a reward of up to $5,000 for information leading to Turner’s capture and confirmed that Virginia State Police had requested their assistance on November 26. Federal authorities and subsequent wanted posters emphasized what should have been clear from the beginning: Turner may be armed, and the public should not approach him.

As of early December, Turner remains at large. The FBI, U.S. Marshals and Virginia State Police continue to search for him while his family pleads for him to come home safely. Meanwhile, the communities of Wise County and the broader region are left with a series of disturbing questions that center not only on what Turner is alleged to have done, but on how the state handled the case once he vanished.

Why was his wife initially told she needed to wait to file a missing‑person report when her husband had walked into the woods with a gun and failed to return? Why did it take until November 25 for felony warrants to be secured and announced, and why did public messaging even after that date downplay the risk he posed? What protocols, if any, did VSP follow for notifying local governments, school systems and residents that a potentially armed fugitive was missing in their back yard?

Perhaps most importantly, what explains the timing on November 20 itself? State agents say they were going to speak with Turner as part of an investigation. His family says he left with a gun that same day, before any warrants were issued. If no one tipped him off, then law enforcement needs to convincingly show what did happen and why.

This is not about second‑guessing every tactical decision in a difficult search through Appalachia’s steep hollows and ridgelines. It is about basic transparency and the duty to warn. When a person under active criminal investigation disappears with a firearm, the default posture should not be “no threat to the community.” The default should be immediate, honest communication with the public and a clear plan for containment.

Southwest Virginia deserves a full, public timeline from Virginia State Police, down to the hour: when the investigation began, when agents were deployed on November 20, when they learned Turner had left, when local law enforcement and school officials were notified, when the missing‑person report was formally taken, when the ten warrants were obtained on November 25, and when each public statement was released. It also deserves to know whether any internal inquiry is underway into possible leaks or informal warnings that might have given Turner time to disappear.

Until those answers are provided, the Travis Turner case will remain more than a disturbing set of criminal allegations. It will stand as an example of how a state agency failed to match its words and actions to the reality on the ground – and how an entire region was left to live with the consequences.

I have asked VSP and local officials all of these questions and have thus far been met with silence.

Marcus Ritchie
SWVAFP

Congrats
11/26/2025

Congrats

WXLZ/Bonanza Players of the Week
Cole Morrison and Levi Honaker

11/25/2025

BREAKING...

11/25/2025

Statement from Turner Family Attorney, I requested an interview which was denied

“I speak today on behalf of Coach Turner’s family," Attorney Adrian Collins said. "We remain prayerful for his safe return and for everyone affected by the circumstances surrounding his disappearance. We trust God to bring truth and clarity in His time. Any allegations should be addressed through the proper legal process—not through speculation or rumor. We ask the public and media to show compassion, accuracy, and respect for the family’s privacy. No questions will be taken."

Virginia State Police have confirmed that 10 warrants have been issued for the arrest of union coach Travis turner.  5 c...
11/25/2025

Virginia State Police have confirmed that 10 warrants have been issued for the arrest of union coach Travis turner.

5 counts of possession of child po*******hy
5 counts of using a computer to solicit a minor

Turner is the second Union High School coach to be accused of s*x related crimes with a minor in the past two years following the 2023 charges against Timothy Lee Meador.

A spokesperson for VSP did not answer questions as to why the case was handled as a missing persons case initially instead of a fugitive case and refused to answer follow up questions on the handling of similar cases. At this time I have filed a FOIA asking for communications between officers at the time of the initial call, report and when they initially went to Turner's house.

Update: Upon speaking with a second spokesperson from VSP it seems they initially treated the case as a missing persons case because arrest warrants had not been officially issued when they went to speak with Turner, still no word on how he knew the timing of the investigation. VSP confirms they are now treating this as a fugitive with warrants type of case.

Address

P. O. Box 362
Rosedale, VA
24280

Telephone

+12765820382

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Southwest Virginia Free Press posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to The Southwest Virginia Free Press:

Share

Category