03/19/2025
The great majority of people believe that the Holocaust of Jews is a fixed historical truth. The propaganda has been driven into them so extensively that questioning it seems as crazy as asking whether World War II ever took place. The average person may distrust the media about many things, but it is seen as inconceivable that they could be lying about the Holocaust. However, there does exist a growing number of people, known as Holocaust revisionists, who argue against the mainstream view. Two books, The Holocaust Narrative by E. Michael Jones, and The Truth Will Set You Free by John Beaumont, are complementary texts dealing with the Holocaust and representing the revisionist approach. Their case is a very strong one indeed.
The first book is the product of Dr. Jones’s expertise in literary criticism, the subject of his doctoral studies. He shows that the Holocaust story is the creation of a series of narratives that began with Allied and Hollywood propaganda campaigns in World War II to cover war crimes committed by the Allies, including the Rheinwiesenlager, Dresden, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Dr. Jones explains how the narrative changed and was taken over by Jewish literary works designed to distract the world’s attention from Allied war crimes to justifying the crimes of the state of Israel and establishing control of the media and Congress by major Jewish organizations. The Holocaust is now the citadel which protects Jewish privilege. No amount of money can liberate us from their tyranny, but the truth can set us free.
These last words introduce the second book. John Beaumont, a lawyer with much experience of the courts and the university sector, examines the evidence relating to the Holocaust. The mainstream approach claims that N**i Germany used a planned program to murder six million Jews in homicidal gas chambers, but relies on conflicting testimonial evidence and puts forward very little by the way of physical evidence. The Jews did suffer much hardship and loss of life. But the claim of a policy of extermination is false. The revisionist approach uses actual forensic evidence to prove that the buildings allegedly used for gassing could not be perfectly sealed, as would be necessary, or anywhere near. Zyklon B (hydrogen cyanide) claimed to be used is highly dangerous, fatal to the touch of anyone affected by it, and with no proper facility for neutralization and elimination afterwards. It would have been lethal to both poisoners and poisoned. Also, the disinfection chambers (necessary to resist the appalling typhus epidemics) became covered with cyanide, but the alleged gas chambers had none. The disposal of the bodies on the enormous scale needed has also been proved impossible, and not one of the thousands of autopsies carried out demonstrated a killing by gas.
The future for the revisionists is a bright one. Professor Thomas Dalton summarises the likely possibilities:
“Evidence, logic and common sense all suggests that the revisionists are right. If so, this has huge implications for the present world. It would mean that people everywhere have been given a false story of human suffering. It would fundamentally discredit the powerful Jewish interests in media and academia that promote the conventional story. And it would mean an end to the many privileges given to the Jews and to Israel, based on the standard account.”
