Wise Guy Talks

Wise Guy Talks WGT is an internet talk show that reflects on the Marxist drift in my beloved America.

My Opinions Are MY OWN and DO NOT REPRESENT ANY OTHER ENTITY.

DEI, Harvard, and Math.Harvard University has implemented a remedial math program to address gaps in foundational math s...
05/26/2025

DEI, Harvard, and Math.

Harvard University has implemented a remedial math program to address gaps in foundational math skills among incoming students. In the 2023–2024 academic year, the Harvard Math Department piloted a new introductory course called Math MA5, designed to rectify deficiencies in algebra, geometry, and quantitative reasoning.

This course runs alongside the existing Math MA and MB courses but features an expanded five-day-per-week schedule with additional support, including varied activities on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

According to Harvard’s Director of Introductory Math, Brendan A. Kelly, the program was introduced to address learning loss attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic, which disrupted high school education and left some students underprepared for college-level math. (Right…)

Students are placed into Math MA5 based on a pre-term skills check, and the course is embedded within the Math M curriculum, sharing the same problem sets, exams, and resources like the Math Question Center.

The introduction of Math MA5 has sparked debate, with critics arguing it reflects a decline in admissions standards, particularly linked to test-optional policies during the pandemic. Harvard reinstated standardized testing requirements for fall 2025 admissions, partly in response to such concerns.

Critics, including commentators like myself, Rikki Schlott and on X, suggest that the need for remedial math at an elite institution like Harvard points to broader issues in K–12 education and DEI admissions processes, while sophist supporters argue it ensures students can succeed in rigorous math courses.

You decide.

Elias Rodriguez, 31, chanted “Free, free Palestine”  moments before he confessed to gunning down a Jewish couple outside...
05/22/2025

Elias Rodriguez, 31, chanted “Free, free Palestine” moments before he confessed to gunning down a Jewish couple outside the Capital Jewish Museum late Wednesday.

Are you happy now, Ilhan Omar Ilhan Omar This is the hate the left represents.

05/21/2025

Joe Scarborough telling Americans to go F themselves for daring to admit the obvious regarding Joe Biden’s decline.

Just a tiny example of the mountain of lies that propped up Joe Biden and the damage he and his minions have perpetuated against America.

05/06/2025

You can’t make this stuff up! 🤔😳😏

Just when Democrats thought Rep. Hank Johnson—who once worried that stationing 8,000 Marines on Guam would cause the island to “become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize”—was a one-of-a-kind, America gets another gem: Rep. Jasmine Crockett.

Criminal History of Dominique Alexander, the founder of the Next Generation Action Network (NGAN), mouthpiece for the Ka...
04/20/2025

Criminal History of Dominique Alexander, the founder of the Next Generation Action Network (NGAN), mouthpiece for the Karmelo Anthony (murder suspect).

• 2009: Felony Injury to a Child

In July 2009, Alexander was arrested for causing serious bodily injury to his then-girlfriend’s 2-year-old son. According to court records reported by the Dallas Observer, Alexander initially claimed the child fell off a couch, but medical examination revealed severe injuries inconsistent with that explanation, including a subdural hemorrhage and retinal hemorrhages in both eyes. A doctor concluded the injuries were consistent with abusive head trauma and child physical abuse. Alexander later confessed to shaking and hitting the child with an object. He pleaded guilty in 2011 and was sentenced to 10 years of deferred adjudication (probation) by Judge Gracie Lewis, avoiding a potential 5-to-99-year prison sentence for the first-degree felony [Web ID: 0][Web ID: 10][Web ID: 19].

• 2012–2016: Probation Violations

Alexander violated his probation multiple times, starting in July 2012. By September 2015, he had eight recorded violations, including missing probation meetings and leaving the state without permission twice in July 2015. In August 2016, he was sentenced to two years in prison for these violations, though he served only eight days because prior time in jail was credited toward his sentence. Alexander blamed then-Dallas Police Chief David Brown for his probation revocation, claiming Brown targeted him for his activism, a claim Brown denied.

• 2013: Felony Forgery Conviction

Alexander was convicted of felony forgery in January 2013 in Dallas County. This prior conviction later enhanced penalties for subsequent charges.

• 2016–2017: Felony Theft Charge

In 2016, Alexander was indicted on felony theft charges stemming from a dispute with a credit card processing company in Flower Mound, Denton County, where he worked as an independent contractor. The charges were enhanced due to his 2013 forgery conviction, increasing the potential penalty to up to 20 years in prison. In 2018, he refused a plea deal for four years in prison. He ultimately pleaded guilty in 2021 and was sentenced to two days in jail.

• 2019: Felony Family Violence Charge (Dismissed)

In April 2019, Alexander was arrested on felony and misdemeanor family violence charges after his longtime partner, Keyaira Saunders, accused him of shoving her, breaking her toe, headbutting her, and attempting to strangle her. Saunders later signed an affidavit before the grand jury indictment, stating she wanted “no part” of the prosecution, feeling betrayed by the Dallas Police Department’s handling of the case. The charges were dismissed in February 2021 due to the prosecution’s inability to build a case, particularly after Saunders refused to testify. Dallas County DA John Creuzot recused himself from the case due to Alexander’s support during his campaign, and a special prosecutor was appointed.

Context and Critical Analysis

• Activism and Public Perception: Alexander’s criminal history has been widely reported, particularly in the context of his activism with NGAN, which he founded in 2014 to combat social injustice, focusing on issues like police brutality and racial discrimination [Web ID: 2]. His legal troubles have often been highlighted by media outlets and critics, especially during high-profile cases like his involvement with Karmelo Anthony in 2025. Some reports frame him as a “career criminal,” a label that gained traction on social media. However, this narrative may oversimplify his history, as his convictions span a range of offenses, and some charges (e.g., family violence) were dismissed.

• Potential Bias in Reporting:

The Dallas Observer, The Dallas Morning News, and other local outlets have extensively covered Alexander’s legal issues, often tying them to his activism [Web ID: 0][Web ID: 3][Web ID: 9]. This focus could reflect a bias toward sensationalizing his criminal past to undermine his credibility as an activist, especially given his vocal criticism of law enforcement. For instance, Alexander has claimed that some charges, like the 2016 theft case, were motivated by his protest activities rather than the merits of the case. On the other hand, the severity of the 2009 child injury case, involving a confession to abuse, is well-documented and cannot be dismissed as mere bias.

• Legal Outcomes and Mitigation:

While Alexander has a clear criminal record, the outcomes of his cases suggest a pattern of leniency or mitigation. His 2016 prison sentence for probation violation resulted in only eight days served, and the 2019 family violence charges were dropped after Saunders declined to cooperate. The 2021 theft conviction resulted in a minimal two-day sentence, which Alexander attributed to avoiding a biased trial in a “Trump County”. This pattern might reflect systemic issues in the criminal justice system, such as plea deals or prosecutorial challenges, but it also raises questions about accountability for serious allegations like child abuse.

• Alexander’s Perspective:

Alexander has consistently framed himself as a target of systemic injustice, particularly by law enforcement, due to his activism. He denied the 2019 family violence allegations and accused Dallas Police Chief David Brown of orchestrating his 2016 probation revocation. While these claims could have merit given the historical tensions between activists and police in Dallas, they lack independent corroboration in the available sources and must be weighed against his documented criminal actions.

• Social Media Sentiment:

Posts on X in April 2025 reflect strong public criticism of Alexander, with users calling him a “criminal” and questioning his credibility as a “minister” and advocate for Karmelo Anthony. These posts highlight his 2009 child injury conviction, probation violations, and family violence allegations, often framing him as unfit to represent anyone in a legal or moral capacity.

The Hypocrisy  (squared) 🫵🏻of Tesla Haters: Driving Cars Built on Blood While Smashing the FuturePosted on Wise Guy Talk...
04/19/2025

The Hypocrisy (squared) 🫵🏻of Tesla Haters: Driving Cars Built on Blood While Smashing the Future

Posted on Wise Guy Talks, April 19, 2025

Let’s talk about irony so thick you could cut it with a knife. There’s a crowd out there—maybe you’ve seen them on X or at some protest—bashing Tesla, spray-painting Cybertrucks, or cheering when a Tesla showroom gets egged. They call Tesla a symbol of greed, elitism, or environmental fakery. Some even go as far as to vandalize Tesla cars, claiming they’re striking a blow against capitalism or whatever buzzword’s trending. But here’s the kicker: many of these same folks hop into their BMWs, Mercedes-Benzes, Toyotas, or Hondas without a second thought. You know, cars made by companies that fueled the Axis powers in World War II, directly contributing to the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans and millions worldwide. Hypocrisy, meet irony. Let’s unpack this.

Tesla: The Scapegoat for Today’s Rage

Tesla’s not perfect. Its cars are pricey, its CEO’s a lightning rod, and its “green” credentials get debated endlessly. But let’s be real: Tesla’s pushing boundaries—electric vehicles, sustainable energy, American innovation. It’s a company born in the USA, employing over 70,000 Americans across its factories and offices. Yet, for some, Tesla’s the ultimate villain. They’ll key a Model Y or cheer when a Tesla’s tires get slashed, claiming it’s a stand against “the system.” Meanwhile, they’re driving cars from brands with blood on their historical ledgers. Let’s take a closer look at those brands.

German and Japanese Companies: A Dark WWII Legacy

During World War II, German and Japanese companies weren’t just bystanders—they were cogs in the war machines that killed millions, including American soldiers. Here’s a quick rundown:

* Mercedes-Benz (Daimler-Benz): Built trucks, tank engines, and aircraft engines for the N***s. They used tens of thousands of forced laborers, including concentration camp inmates, worked to death in brutal conditions. American GIs faced these vehicles on the battlefields of Europe.

* BMW: Supplied Luftwaffe aircraft engines and motorcycles, also using up to 50,000 slave laborers from concentration camps. Their wartime profits helped rebuild their luxury brand post-war.

* Volkswagen: Born under Hitler’s “people’s car” vision, VW produced military vehicles like the Kübelwagen and V-1 flying bombs, relying on 20,000 forced laborers.

* Toyota: Supplied trucks and military vehicles for the Imperial Japanese Army, which fought Americans across the Pacific, from Pearl Harbor to Iwo Jima. Toyota’s wartime production was fueled by Japan’s militarized economy.

* Honda: Though smaller then, Honda’s early work included piston rings for Japanese military aircraft, contributing to the war effort that cost 400,000 American lives.

These companies weren’t just “following orders.”

They profited from war, exploited human suffering, and powered regimes responsible for unimaginable destruction. The Battle of the Bulge, Pearl Harbor, Okinawa—American blood was spilled fighting machines built by these brands. Yet today, their cars are status symbols, parked in driveways across America without a whisper of protest.

The Tortured Irony of Tesla Vandalism
Now, picture this: someone smashes a Tesla’s window to “protest capitalism,” then drives off in a BMW X5 or a Toyota Camry. The irony is staggering. They’re boycotting an American company that’s creating jobs and tackling climate change (however imperfectly) while cruising in vehicles from companies that armed America’s enemies. It’s like spitting on a firefighter’s truck while praising the arsonist’s getaway car.

Take the folks at groups like Tesla Takedown or Indivisible.

They’ll scream about Tesla’s environmental impact or Elon’s tweets, but where’s their outrage for Mercedes-Benz’s slave labor history? Why no spray paint on a VW Beetle for its N**i roots? The silence is deafening. It’s almost as if the past gets a free pass, but a company trying to innovate today is fair game.

And don’t get me started on the vandalism.

Damaging a Tesla doesn’t just hurt some faceless corporation—it screws over owners, many of whom are regular folks who saved up for a Model 3. It’s futile, too. The perpetrators look irrational, alienating the public and boosting Tesla’s underdog narrative. Meanwhile, those German and Japanese cars? They glide by, untouched, their dark histories conveniently forgotten.

Hypocrisy in the Driver’s Seat

Why the double standard? Part of it’s selective memory. World War II feels like ancient history, and these companies have spent decades rebranding as icons of luxury or reliability. They’ve apologized, sure—joined restitution funds like the “Remembrance, Responsibility and Future” initiative, paying into a €5.1 billion pool for forced laborers. But those payments were a drop in the bucket compared to their wartime profits, which fueled their pos mi t-war dominance. BMW’s Quandt family, Mercedes-Benz, Toyota—they’re still thriving, no boycotts needed.

Tesla, on the other hand, is a fresh target.

It’s American, it’s disruptive, and its leader’s unfiltered style makes it easy to hate. The mainstream media doesn’t help, amplifying every Tesla misstep while ignoring the historical baggage of foreign brands. It’s easier to vilify what’s new and loud than to confront a past everyone’s agreed to forgive.

A Call to Wake Up

So, next time you see someone trashing Tesla—literally or figuratively—ask them what they drive. If it’s a German or Japanese car, point out the irony. Ask why they’re cool with brands that powered the Third Reich or Imperial Japan but lose sleep over an electric car company. Maybe they’ll think twice. Or maybe they’ll just rev their Audi and speed off, oblivious to the history under the hood.

Here’s the deal: if you’re going to take a stand, make it consistent. Boycott all companies with dirty pasts or none at all. Anything else is just hypocrisy dressed up as principle. Tesla’s not a saint, but it’s building a future—American jobs, clean energy, innovation. Those other brands? They built war machines. Choose your heroes wisely.

What do you think? Sound off in the comments or share.






Democrats are the party of violence. Alarming new report from the Network Contagion Research Institute shows the Left ar...
04/14/2025

Democrats are the party of violence.

Alarming new report from the Network Contagion Research Institute shows the Left are increasingly normalizing violence

- 55.2% say it’s justified to kiII Trump
- 48.6% say it’s justified to kiII Elon
- 57.6% say it’s acceptable to destroy Tesla dealerships

Democrat leadership incited this.

sits silently as Facebook is used to propel the unhinged.

04/13/2025

Another inconvenient truth about “unelected officials,” hired by Trump…A Threat To Democracy? Really!

Key Czars and Advisors Appointed by Obama
1. Carol Browner – Energy and Climate Czar (Director, White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy)
- Appointed: January 2009
- Role: Coordinated climate policy, advised on environmental regulations, and led efforts on cap-and-trade proposals.
- Note: Served until 2011; role was later restructured.

2. Van Jones – Green Jobs Czar (Special Advisor for Green Jobs, Enterprise, and Innovation, Council on Environmental Quality)
- Appointed: March 2009
- Role: Promoted green energy jobs and economic initiatives.
- Note: Resigned in September 2009 amid controversy over past statements.

3. John Holdren – Science Czar (Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy)
- Appointed: January 2009
- Role: Advised on science, technology, and innovation policy, including climate and health research.
- Note: Senate-confirmed, but often called a czar due to influence.

4. Cass Sunstein – Regulatory Czar (Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs)
- Appointed: September 2009
- Role: Oversaw federal regulations, streamlining or revising rules across agencies.
- Note: Served until 2012; returned to academia.

5. Todd Stern – Climate Czar (Special Envoy for Climate Change, State Department)
- Appointed: January 2009
- Role: Led international climate negotiations, including Paris Agreement groundwork.
- Note: Focused on diplomacy rather than domestic policy.

6. Steven Rattner – Auto Industry Czar (Counselor to the Treasury Secretary, Head of Auto Task Force)
- Appointed: February 2009
- Role: Oversaw restructuring of GM and Chrysler during the 2009 auto bailout.
- Note: Left after six months; role was temporary.

7. Nancy-Ann DeParle – Health Czar (Director, White House Office of Health Reform)
- Appointed: March 2009
- Role: Coordinated Affordable Care Act development and implementation.
- Note: Served until 2011; later joined private sector.

8. Ron Bloom – Manufacturing Czar (Senior Advisor for Manufacturing Policy)
- Appointed: September 2009
- Role: Focused on revitalizing U.S. manufacturing, post-auto bailout.
- Note: Also served as auto czar successor; left in 2011.

9. Kenneth Feinberg – Compensation Czar (Special Master for TARP Executive Compensation)
- Appointed: June 2009
- Role: Set pay limits for executives at bailed-out firms (e.g., AIG, Bank of America).
- Note: Temporary role; also later handled BP oil spill fund.

10. Elizabeth Warren – Consumer Protection Czar (Special Advisor to the Treasury Secretary, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)
- Appointed: September 2010
- Role: Set up the CFPB to protect consumers from financial abuses.
- Note: Left in 2011 to run for Senate; did not become permanent CFPB head.

11. Joshua DuBois – Faith-Based Czar (Director, White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships)
- Appointed: February 2009
- Role: Coordinated outreach to religious and community groups for social programs.
- Note: Served until 2013.

12. Mark Schwartz – Afghanistan-Pakistan Czar (Special Advisor on Afghanistan and Pakistan)
- Appointed: Early 2009
- Role: Advised on military and diplomatic strategy in the region.
- Note: Worked under Richard Holbrooke; role less publicized.

13. Jeffrey Crowley – AIDS Czar (Director, White House Office of National AIDS Policy)
- Appointed: February 2009
- Role: Coordinated HIV/AIDS policy and prevention programs.
- Note: Served until 2011.

14. Alan Bersin – Border Czar (Assistant Secretary for International Affairs, DHS)
- Appointed: April 2009
- Role: Managed border security and immigration enforcement policies.
- Note: Served until 2011; role overlapped with confirmed DHS duties.

15. Gil Kerlikowske – Drug Czar (Director, Office of National Drug Control Policy)
- Appointed: May 2009
- Role: Led anti-drug efforts, shifting focus to prevention and treatment.
- Note: Senate-confirmed but often listed as a czar.

16. Ashton Carter – Weapons Czar (Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics)
- Appointed: April 2009
- Role: Oversaw defense procurement and weapons programs.
- Note: Later became Defense Secretary; czar label less formal.

17. Adolfo Carrión Jr. – Urban Affairs Czar (Director, White House Office of Urban Affairs)
- Appointed: February 2009
- Role: Coordinated policies for cities, housing, and infrastructure.
- Note: Left in 2010 for HUD role.

18. Vivek Kundra – Technology Czar (U.S. Chief Information Officer)
- Appointed: March 2009
- Role: Modernized federal IT systems and promoted cybersecurity.
- Note: Served until 2011.

19. Dennis Ross – Middle East Czar (Special Advisor for the Persian Gulf and Southwest Asia)
- Appointed: June 2009
- Role: Advised on Iran, Israel-Palestine, and regional diplomacy.
- Note: Left in 2011.

20. Paul Volcker – Economic Recovery Czar (Chairman, Economic Recovery Advisory Board)
- Appointed: February 2009
- Role: Advised on post-2008 financial crisis recovery.
- Note: Board disbanded in 2011.

04/13/2025

Trade War runs up against Great Wall of Trump.

04/13/2025

Part 3: Tariffs

2. Why Do Nations Prefer Surpluses and Protective Tariffs?

Nations chase trade surpluses because they’re not idiots—they see the scoreboard. A surplus means you’re selling more than you’re buying, piling up wealth, jobs, and industrial capacity. Germany’s $300 billion surplus in 2023 didn’t happen by accident; it’s a machine built on exports. China’s $295 billion surplus with the U.S. in 2024 fuels its factories and global clout. Protective tariffs shield domestic firms from foreign competition, letting them grow without being undercut by cheaper imports. It’s not charity; it’s self-interest.

Are these nations suicidal for sticking with surpluses and tariffs? No—they’re playing to win. The U.S., with its $1 trillion-plus annual deficits, isn’t “brilliant” for playing the opposite game. Deficits hollow out manufacturing—U.S. factory jobs dropped from 19 million in 1980 to 13 million by 2024. They drain wealth, making you a debtor nation reliant on foreign goodwill. Why don’t others copy our deficits? Because they’re not in the business of subsidizing competitors. Sowell would point out the obvious: no nation gets rich by bleeding capital indefinitely.

04/13/2025

“A lot of shady stuff going on with Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett,” Attorney Sholdon Daniels.


Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett being investigated by the FEC. ActBlue up to their necks in this investigation.The Federa...
04/13/2025

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett being investigated by the FEC. ActBlue up to their necks in this investigation.

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) has launched an investigation into Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) regarding donations to her 2024 re-election campaign made through ActBlue, a Democratic fundraising platform. The probe was initiated following a complaint filed on March 26, 2025, by the Coolidge-Reagan Foundation, a conservative advocacy group. The complaint alleges that Crockett’s campaign received suspicious contributions, including 53 separate donations totaling $595 from a 73-year-old Texas resident, Randy Best, whose wife claimed no knowledge of the donations. The complaint further notes that Crockett’s campaign received over $870,000 through ActBlue, raising concerns about potentially fraudulent transactions made without donors’ consent.

Crockett was notified of the complaint by the FEC on April 2, 2025, and has 15 days to respond, though extensions of 30 to 60 days are commonly granted. The investigation is ongoing, and no final conclusions have been reported. Neither Crockett’s campaign nor ActBlue has publicly commented on the matter.

The complaint alleges that Crocket's campaign accepted 56 separate donations from a 73-year-old retiree who was allegedly unaware of the donations.

Address

Southlake, TX
76092

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Wise Guy Talks posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Wise Guy Talks:

Share