https://www.facebook.com/103806197633717/

Crowned Chinese Cresteds, Venice, FL (2026)

09/12/2026

Should Breeders Refuse to Sell to Someone Who Wants “Just One Litter”?

I get this one all the time: “I don’t really want to be a breeder. I just want her to have one litter.”

Usually it comes from a good place. People imagine a sweet little experience with their dog, a handful of adorable puppies, maybe letting the kids watch them grow up, and then finding them all loving homes. Sometimes they tell me they want their female to “experience motherhood,” which always makes me smile a little because I promise you, she is not lying awake at night wondering whether she is missing her calling.

The part people do not always realize is that there really is no such thing as “just one litter” when you are the person responsible for bringing those puppies into the world.

Before you ever breed the dog, there should be health testing, pedigree research, an honest evaluation of structure and temperament, and a reason for choosing that particular male. The fact that your friend has a cute intact male down the street is not really a breeding strategy. You need to know what both dogs may bring to the litter, including the things you cannot see by looking at them, understand the genetics and health behind each and make sure both are fully health tested and understand the results.

Then there is the pregnancy itself. Most of the time things may go perfectly well, but whelping is not without risk. A puppy can become stuck, labor can stall, a C-section can become necessary, puppies can be born weak, and occasionally you can lose puppies or even put the mother at risk. That wonderful “experience” can turn into a 2:00 a.m. trip to the emergency vet very quickly, and emergency clinics have an amazing ability to make your credit card start sweating before you even get through the door. An emergency C-section here in my parts will run $5,000 - $10,000 (the latter is Blue Pearl).

And if everything does go beautifully, congratulations. Now you have puppies. That means feeding, cleaning, weighing, watching, socializing, veterinary care, sleepless nights, and figuring out which homes are actually appropriate. It means not leaving the house for weeks because mom hasn't mastered sitting in the box without sitting on a puppy so you listen out for the tell tale squeals that make you run in and rescue the puppy. And there is also the care for mom who now doesn't want to leave the box and you find yourself delivering meals and coaxing her to eat 4 times a day.

Then those puppies leave, and the responsibility does not magically disappear with them. Those are dogs you brought into the world, and ideally you should care where they are and what happens to them for the rest of their lives.

That is the part I think gets missed when someone says, “We only want to do it once.” They are usually thinking about the eight weeks of cute puppies. A breeder is thinking about everything that comes before those eight weeks and potentially the next fifteen years afterward.

Now, could someone start as a pet owner and eventually become a responsible breeder? Absolutely. Every breeder started somewhere. But there is a big difference between saying, “I want to learn, find a mentor, health test my dog, study the breed, and make a thoughtful breeding decision,” and saying, “We thought one litter would be fun.”

If you have done all of the first part, then you are not really talking about casually having one litter anymore. You are beginning to understand what responsible breeding actually involves.

That is why I have no problem placing a puppy with a no-breeding agreement. It is not about keeping some secret breeder club closed to newcomers. It is about knowing that breeding should start with a purpose, not just a desire to experience puppies. Because yes, puppies are wonderful. They are also expensive, exhausting, messy, unpredictable, and occasionally heartbreaking. And that litter carries a tremendous responsibility that each puppy will be carefully placed so as to not continue the "just one litter" train of thought.

And whether it is your first litter or your fiftieth, the puppies deserve exactly the same level of planning and responsibility.

They do not know they were “just this once.”

09/11/2026

Is “Adopt, Don’t Shop” Unfair to Responsible Breeders?

“Adopt, don’t shop” started with a good intention. There are a lot of wonderful dogs in shelters and rescues that deserve homes, and I have a tremendous amount of respect for the people who work hard to place them.

Where I think the message gets a little sideways is when it starts being used to shame anyone who buys a puppy from a breeder.

Buying from a responsible breeder is not the same thing as buying from a puppy mill, a backyard breeder, or someone producing litter after litter with no health testing, no thought behind the breeding, and no real concern about where those puppies end up.
Those things should not all be shoved into the same bucket.

A responsible breeder is usually putting years of work into their program. They are studying pedigrees, doing health testing, planning breedings carefully, raising puppies in the home, socializing them, screening buyers, supporting those buyers after the puppy leaves, and taking responsibility for the dogs they produce if something ever goes wrong.

That is not exactly the same thing as “shopping for a dog” like you are picking out a toaster.

And honestly, not every family is looking for the same thing.

Some people want a specific breed because they understand the size, temperament, grooming needs, activity level, or personality and know that breed fits their life. Some want a puppy whose history they know from birth. Some want to show, compete, or preserve a breed they have loved for years.

I do not think any of that automatically makes them selfish.

You can absolutely support rescue and still support responsible breeding. Those two things do not have to be enemies.

I actually think a much better message would be, “Adopt responsibly or buy responsibly.”

Because the real issue is not whether money changed hands. The real issue is whether the dog came from a responsible source and whether the people involved are willing to stand behind that dog for its lifetime.

That is also why I get a little frustrated when responsible breeders are blamed for shelter overpopulation as though every breeder is contributing to the problem in the same way.

The breeders I know who take their programs seriously do not want their dogs ending up in shelters or rescues. They have contracts. They stay in contact with buyers. They take dogs back or help rehome them if life falls apart.

If one of my dogs ever needs help, I want to know about it. That is part of the responsibility.

So when somebody says, “You should have adopted instead of buying from a breeder,” I think the better question is simply: did that person get their dog responsibly?

A responsibly bred puppy can end up in a wonderful home.

A responsibly adopted rescue can end up in a wonderful home.
There is room for both.

What I do not think helps dogs is turning one choice into a badge of morality and the other into something people should feel guilty about.

So I am curious what everyone thinks. Has “adopt, don’t shop” become unfair to responsible breeders, or do you still think the slogan does more good than harm?

09/10/2026

Should Pet Owners Be Allowed to Keep Intact Dogs?
This one is a little close to home for me because, in theory, I absolutely believe a responsible pet owner can keep an intact dog without ever breeding it.

In practice?

Well… that depends very heavily on the word responsible.

I have placed dogs with very clear contracts stating they were not to be bred, only to have the contract ignored later because the owners allowed the dogs to mate. Then comes the explanation: “It was an accident,” “We didn’t understand her cycle,” or “We didn’t realize he could get to her.”

And that is where my sympathy gets a little thin.

Dogs do not accidentally read the contract and decide to violate it. People fail to manage them.

If you choose to keep an intact male and female in the same household, you need to understand exactly what that means. A female in season needs to be securely separated from intact males. Not “we were watching them.” Not “they were only alone for a minute.” Not “he usually stays in the other room.”

Dogs are incredibly motivated when hormones get involved, and they are apparently not impressed by baby gates, screen doors, or your confidence in the situation.

That said, I still do not believe every pet dog automatically needs to be spayed or neutered simply because it will never be bred.

There are owners who manage intact dogs responsibly for their entire lives. They understand reproductive cycles, they prevent accidental breedings, they keep dogs securely contained, and they take the responsibility seriously.

The problem is that breeders have to make that judgment before handing over the puppy.

And sometimes we get it wrong.

A contract is important, but a contract cannot physically keep two dogs apart. It cannot teach someone what a heat cycle looks like. It cannot stop an owner from deciding three years later that “just one litter” would be fun.

That piece of paper is only as good as the person who agreed to it.

This is why I completely understand breeders who require pet puppies to eventually be spayed or neutered. Sometimes that requirement is not about controlling the buyer. It comes from having already lived through the consequences of trusting someone who promised they would never breed the dog.

On the other hand, I also think there should be room for thoughtful conversations about timing and the individual dog rather than automatically insisting every puppy be altered at the earliest possible age.

So for me, the question is not simply, “Should pet owners be allowed to keep intact dogs?”

It is, “Can this particular owner be trusted to manage an intact dog responsibly for its entire reproductive life?”

Because if you do not understand a heat cycle, cannot guarantee separation, or think “oops” is an acceptable explanation for producing a litter, then no — you probably should not have intact dogs of opposite sexes living together.

Accidents happen.

But some accidents are remarkably predictable.

And when a breeder has specifically told you not to breed the dog, put it in writing, explained why, and trusted you with that dog, “we didn’t mean to” does not undo the litter.

So I’m curious where other breeders land on this.

Do you trust pet owners to keep dogs intact under contract, or have too many “accidental” litters convinced you that eventually requiring spay/neuter is the safer route?

09/09/2026

Should You Let Your Dog Sleep in Your Bed?

This is one of those topics where people usually have a very firm opinion. Some people believe dogs belong in their own beds, preferably somewhere on the floor, and others cannot imagine sleeping without a dog curled up next to them.

Then there are Chinese Crested owners, who are mostly laughing because the dog made that decision for them a long time ago.

I do not think most people intentionally decide, “Tonight is the night I give up half my bed to a 10-pound dog.” It usually happens gradually. Maybe the puppy is allowed up just for a few minutes. Maybe it is cold. Maybe it looks pathetic. Maybe you tell yourself it is only temporary.

A week later, the dog is under the covers, pressed against your back, using your pillow, and somehow you are sleeping on the edge of the mattress wondering how something so small can take up so much room.

Chinese Cresteds are especially talented at this because they love warmth and closeness. If there is a blanket and a warm human underneath it, they are going to find both. They do not just want to be near you. They want to be attached to you like a small heating pad with opinions.

Now, there are perfectly valid reasons not to let a dog sleep in the bed. Some people have allergies. Some dogs disturb sleep. Some households have multiple dogs and things get complicated. Some people simply prefer not to have dog hair, dirt, or whatever else came in from the yard on their sheets.

Fair enough.

But for a lot of people, sleeping with their dog becomes part of the relationship. It is comforting. It is familiar. And after a while, the bed feels strangely empty without them there.

The funny part is how quickly the rules change. “We are NOT letting this puppy sleep in the bed.”

That usually lasts until the first night the puppy cries. Then it becomes, “Okay, just until he settles.”

And somehow, by the end of the week, the dog has a favorite blanket, a preferred side of the bed, and you are the one being asked to move.

And they are never subtle about it either. You shift them an inch and they sigh like you have deeply disappointed them. You try to stretch your legs and suddenly there is resistance. You wake up at 3:00 in the morning and realize the dog is stretched sideways across the bed like it pays the mortgage.

For such a small breed, Chinese Cresteds have an amazing ability to expand once they are asleep.

So do I think dogs have to sleep in the bed? No.

Do I think there is anything wrong with letting them? Also no, as long as everyone is comfortable, everyone is sleeping well, and there are no behavior issues involved.
But if you tell me your Chinese Crested is absolutely not allowed in the bed, and I can clearly see a little head sticking out from under your comforter, I am probably going to have questions.

So where do you stand?

Dogs in the bed, absolutely not?

Or did you used to have rules before you owned a Chinese Crested?

09/08/2026

I just spent the weekend turning my sunroom into an office, which apparently means Echo has also accepted a new position. --Supervisor.

His responsibilities so far include sitting in the chair, watching everything I do, offering absolutely no useful assistance, and making sure I never leave the room without him noticing.

That’s life with a Chinese Crested.

They really don’t care what you’re doing. You can be working, cleaning, folding laundry, making dinner or trying to go to the bathroom alone. Their only real concern is, “Are you going somewhere, and if so, why am I not coming?”

Cresteds are incredibly people-oriented dogs. They don’t just like being around their humans—they want to be part of whatever is happening, even when whatever is happening is watching you move furniture and plug in computer monitors for two hours.

They’re little shadows with opinions.

And apparently, Echo takes office renovation very seriously.

09/08/2026

You Bred It. Are You Responsible for It Forever?

This is one of those questions that sounds easy when everyone is talking about an adorable eight-week-old puppy.

“Of course I’ll always take my dogs back.”

Most responsible breeders mean that when they say it. I certainly think breeders should remain a safety net for the dogs they produce. If an owner can no longer keep one of my dogs, I would much rather know about it and help than find out later that the dog was passed around, dumped in rescue, or ended up somewhere it never should have been. But life is not always neat.

What if the dog is twelve years old and the owner dies? What if the breeder has retired, downsized, moved into a smaller home, or is dealing with health problems of their own? What if the dog has serious behavioral issues that were never disclosed? What if the breeder already has a house full of dogs and physically bringing another one home is not the safest option for anyone?

Does “I will always take the dog back” mean that dog must literally move back into the breeder’s house no matter what?

I’m not sure it does.

To me, the responsibility is bigger than simply opening the front door.

If I bred the dog, I believe I have an obligation to help make sure it lands somewhere safe. Sometimes that may mean the dog comes back to me. Sometimes it may mean I help locate an appropriate new home, work with someone I trust, arrange transport, or stay involved while another solution is found.

The important part is that I do not say, “Sorry, not my problem anymore. Because somewhere along the way, that dog existed because I made the decision to produce it. That matters.

At the same time, I think breeders sometimes make promises that sound wonderful in puppy contracts but are not always realistic fifteen years later. None of us knows exactly what our own life will look like that far down the road.

So perhaps the better promise is not, “This dog will physically come back into my house under every possible circumstance.”

Maybe the promise should be, “If this dog ever needs help, I will not abandon it.” That feels much more meaningful to me.

And buyers have responsibilities too. A breeder being willing to help does not mean an owner gets to make careless decisions and then simply hand the consequences back. If there is a behavioral problem, medical issue, major life change, or concern about keeping the dog, talk to the breeder before the situation becomes a crisis.
Give us a chance to help.

Most breeders would much rather get the uncomfortable phone call early than the heartbreaking phone call after everything has already fallen apart.

I also think this is one of those areas where breeder culture can become a little unrealistic. We sometimes hear, “A good breeder ALWAYS takes every dog back, no questions asked,” as though anything less means the breeder does not care. I think good breeders care enough to make sure the dog is safe.

How that happens may look different depending on the dog, the owner, the breeder, and the circumstances.

The responsibility should last longer than the puppy guarantee. It should not necessarily require a spare bedroom forever.

So I’m curious where other breeders land on this one. If you bred the dog, are you responsible for it for life?

And does that mean physically taking it back into your home, or making sure it has somewhere safe to go?

09/07/2026

The Queen … Harper

09/07/2026

REALITY CHECK: Puppies are absolutely ridiculous little miracles. Think about this for a minute. Every time I have a litter I am reminded what a miracle this process really is.

From conception to birth, a puppy has roughly 63 days to go from basically microscopic beginnings to a fully formed little dog. Sixty-three days.

In that time, Mother Nature has to build:

A brain -- A heart --Lungs -- A liver -- Kidneys -- A spine -- Four legs -- Four feet -- A tail -- Eyes -- Nose -- and Ears.

AND ......Tiny little toenails !!! Love those tiny little digits

09/07/2026

Are Puppy Contracts Becoming Too Controlling?

Here’s one that could probably start an argument before the first cup of coffee.
I absolutely believe breeders should have contracts. A good contract protects the dog, the breeder, and the buyer. It should spell out things like breeding rights, health guarantees, what happens if the buyer can no longer keep the dog, and any responsibilities both sides agreed to before the puppy goes home. That all makes sense.

But sometimes I read puppy contracts and wonder whether the breeder sold a dog or issued a 14-year lease.

There are contracts that dictate the exact food the dog must eat, what supplements it must take, which vaccines are allowed, which medications are forbidden, when it can be spayed or neutered, what kind of fencing the buyer must have, whether the dog can attend daycare, where it can sleep, and practically what direction it should face during a full moon.

At some point, I think we have to ask where responsible protection ends and control begins.

I understand why breeders become particular. We pour years of planning, money, emotion, health testing, sleepless nights, and a fair amount of insanity into producing a litter. Then we hand one of those puppies to someone else and hope they make good decisions for the next 12, 15, or maybe even 18 years. That is not easy.

There are absolutely things I want in a contract because they affect my breeding program or the future safety of the dog. If I place a puppy as a pet, I do not want someone deciding two years later that it would be fun to breed it. If someone can no longer keep one of my dogs, I want to know about it rather than finding out it was handed off to a stranger or landed in rescue.

Those are reasonable protections.

But once a puppy is sold to a capable adult, I also have to accept that I am no longer making every everyday decision for that dog.

I can educate. I can recommend. I can explain why I do things a certain way. I can tell someone what has worked well in my lines and what I would personally avoid.
That is very different from trying to control every veterinary, nutritional, and lifestyle decision through a contract.

And some of those rules can become especially problematic when circumstances change. Veterinary recommendations evolve. A dog develops a medical condition. A food stops working. The buyer moves. A medication becomes necessary. The veterinarian standing in front of the actual dog may reasonably recommend something the breeder never anticipated when the contract was written.

At that point, I would much rather have an owner who feels comfortable calling me and having a conversation than one who is afraid they have “violated the contract.”
Good breeder relationships should not feel like probation.

I also think buyers need to take some responsibility here. Read the contract before you hand over money. All of it. If you disagree with the breeder’s requirements, that is the time to talk about it — not six months later when everyone is angry.

And breeders, if you feel you need four pages of rules governing every possible decision somebody could make with the dog, maybe the bigger issue is whether you trust the person you are selling the puppy to in the first place.

For me, a contract should protect the things that truly matter while leaving room for common sense.

Protect the dog.

Protect the breeding program.

Set clear expectations.

But at some point, we also have to let good owners actually own their dogs.
So where do you draw the line? What absolutely belongs in a puppy contract, and what makes you read one and think, “Yeah… this is getting a little ridiculous”?

09/06/2026

Is Linebreeding Responsible Preservation Breeding… or Just Inbreeding With Better PR?

Linebreeding is one of those words dog breeders use very comfortably, while people outside the breeding world hear it and think, “Wait… you bred WHAT to WHAT?”
And technically, they are not completely wrong to raise an eyebrow.

Linebreeding is a form of inbreeding. The difference is usually one of degree and purpose. Instead of breeding very close relatives, the goal is generally to concentrate the influence of a particular ancestor or family of dogs farther back in the pedigree.
Breeders do it because it can help make traits more predictable. If you have a line known for beautiful heads, sound movement, correct type, strong temperaments, or other qualities you want to preserve, linebreeding can increase the chances of those traits showing up again.

That is the attractive part.

The less glamorous part is that genes do not only carry the things we like.
If you concentrate desirable traits, you can also concentrate whatever undesirable recessives, health problems, structural weaknesses, or temperament issues may be hiding in that same family.

Genetics does not look at the pedigree and say, “Oh, they only wanted Grandma’s head. Leave everything else out.”

Wouldn’t that be handy?

This is why I think linebreeding itself is not automatically good or bad. The real question is how much the breeder actually knows about the dogs being concentrated.

If you know the health history, longevity, temperaments, strengths, weaknesses, siblings, offspring, and what has repeatedly appeared in that family over generations, you are making a much more informed decision.

If you are linebreeding simply because there are famous names on both sides of the pedigree, that is a very different situation.

And this ties directly into why health transparency between breeders matters so much. You cannot make an intelligent decision about concentrating a family if important information about that family is being withheld.

A pedigree may look beautiful on paper while carrying a problem nobody wants to discuss.

That is where linebreeding can become dangerous very quickly.

I also think breeders sometimes get a little too comfortable with the terminology.
We call one breeding “linebreeding” because it sounds thoughtful and intentional, then look at somebody else’s pedigree and call theirs “inbreeding” because we do not like what they did.

The genes are not impressed by our vocabulary.

What matters is the actual relationship between the dogs, the amount of genetic diversity being lost, what traits are being concentrated, and whether the breeder understands the risks they are taking.

There is another side to this too. Constantly outcrossing does not automatically guarantee healthier dogs. An outcross can introduce problems you have never seen before just as easily as it can bring in something beneficial. A completely unrelated pedigree does not arrive carrying a certificate that says, “Congratulations, no surprises in here.”

Breeding is rarely that simple.

For me, the issue comes down to purpose and knowledge. If I am going to concentrate a family, I want a reason for doing it beyond “I really like that dog.” I want to know as much as possible about what I am doubling up on, including the things that are not printed on a championship certificate.

Because linebreeding can absolutely preserve valuable traits. It can also preserve problems.

And sometimes the difference between the two is simply how much information the breeder had before making the decision.

So I am curious where everyone lands on this one.

Do you see linebreeding as an important tool in preservation breeding, something that should be used very cautiously, or just inbreeding with a prettier name?

Crowned Chinese Cresteds

09/12/2026

09/11/2026

09/10/2026

09/09/2026

09/08/2026

09/08/2026

09/07/2026

09/07/2026

09/07/2026

09/06/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Shortcuts

Share

Category

Listing takedown request