12/13/2025
It’s Time to Restore Sanity to Pesticide Labeling by Gerard Scimeca.
"In any functioning market, consumers deserve information they can trust — and businesses need clear rules they can follow. Accurate, science-based product labels are essential to that balance. But when states start imposing their own special-interest-driven labeling mandates, science is thrown out the window and consumers are left to fend for themselves.
"Just look at Proposition 65, California’s infamous chemical warning law. To comply, nearly every product — from potato chips and furniture to coffee cups and parking garages — now bears a 'may cause cancer' label. There are even Prop 65 warnings on trees (yes, that’s real).
"Many of these warnings have little grounding in real-world risk and defy common sense. They serve to bewilder, rather than inform consumers. The ubiquitous hazard warnings have ironically created their own hazard, a populace surrendering to indifference. With everything labeled 'dangerous,' danger becomes the new normal, leaving consumers unable to discern 'boy who cried wolf' hysteria from real and known health hazards.
"This issue has emerged as a key problem in the regulation of crop protection tools today, as state legislatures in California and elsewhere have pursued labeling mandates that conflict with federal law and well-established scientific consensus.
"If this patchwork approach continues unchecked, it will create an unworkable system that threatens consumers’ access to essential products.
"What’s needed is straightforward: legislation to protect labeling uniformity. When the Environmental Protection Agency approves a pesticide label after years of scientific testing and review, that label should be the law of the land. And there are three good reasons to reaffirm this policy. ..."
In any functioning market, consumers deserve information they can trust — and businesses need clear rules they can follow. Accurate, science-based product