09/13/2026
đ„ THE DANCE OF THE DRAGONS DESTROYED A DYNASTY⊠AND ONE MARRIAGE MIGHT HAVE PREVENTED THE ENTIRE THING. đđ
So why werenât Rhaenyra Targaryen and Aegon II married in the first place?
It sounds strange at firstâthey were half-siblings with roughly a decade between themâbut by Targaryen standards, sibling marriage was hardly shocking. More importantly, such a match could have attacked the succession crisis at its very source.
Imagine this scenario:
Rhaenyra remains Viserysâ named heir and future Queen Regnant. Aegon becomes her prince-consort rather than her rival king.
Suddenly, the two competing branches of Viserysâ family are joined instead of being pushed toward war.
Alicent would see her son connected directly to the throne. Otto would gain Hightower blood in the future royal line. And Aegonâwho initially showed little enthusiasm for taking the crownâwouldn't necessarily need to carry the burden of ruling himself.
Most importantly, their children would combine Rhaenyraâs claim with Aegonâs position as Viserysâ eldest surviving son. That could make it far harder for ambitious lords to divide themselves into Black and Green factions.
Even the Velaryon problem might have had political solutions through future marriages and alliances, potentially keeping Corlys, Baela and the Velaryon power bloc connected to the royal succession.
Of course, it wouldn't guarantee peace. Otto's ambitions, Daemon's position, Corlys' interests, personality conflicts and Westerosi resistance to a ruling queen would still exist.
But compare those problems with what actually happened:
Dragons killed dragons.
Brother fought sister.
Children became casualties.
House Targaryen devastated itself.
And suddenly this uncomfortable marriage starts looking like one of the biggest âWHAT IFsâ in Targaryen history.
đ If Viserys had announced: âRhaenyra remains my heir, and Aegon will be her consortââdoes the Dance still happen? Or did Viserys miss the one political marriage that could have saved his family?