10/31/2025
                                            The city is paying $56,000 for an "update" to the city website that was only built within the past three years and cost over $30,000. 
The work that is stated to be done in the contract is logo design, brand creation, which can be costly but why does the city need to do this when they just did it? The current website is already modern and mobile friendly. If changes need to be made, the company that designed and maintains it now and that the city pays ongoing to do that, can make changes.
That is typically included in the yearly maintenance contract. Spending over $50,000 when we have a water infrastructure that needs an overhaul seems unnecessary.
What the city needs is a better way to communicate with citizens and that can be set up and managed for less than $200/month. 
This proposal was apparently voted on by council with unanimous approval. 
They should have talked to someone who knows about tech before making this decision. They should have obtained several proposals and looked at the experience and past work of everyone being considered. This is very expensive for what is to be delivered.