19/08/2026
Your disagreement with Dr. Sibanda and Adv Baloyi is rooted in their choice to pursue docket 636 instead of 375 rather than any personal vendetta.
In similar vein, your concern with Gininda is his failure to support your position, not any personal animosity. You would have accepted Gininda's actions if he had arrested those who were in the house.
This case was complicated by the police who intentionally created a conflicting docket to hinder the original one.
This polarization resulted in both a division within the case and a fragmentation of public opinion.
A more judicious approach for the Makhubo team would have been to await the full testing of the first docket's credibility prior to initiating another one. The creation of a conflicting docket is the reason why some people do not like the prosecution case before court.
The five men accused are leveraging this situation recognizing that they have your support notwithstanding the evidence implicating them. Even some content creators are also exploiting this situation by disseminating misinformation and perpetuating the notion of a cover up.
I have been following criminal cases prior to Senzo Meyiwa's demise and continue to do so to this day.
I have encountered dozens of similar cases, the only distinguishing feature of this case is the conflicting dockets, everything else I have seen before.
A mastermind's arrest may be delayed, the absence of DNA evidence does not necessarily establish the accused person's innocence if other evidence ties them to the crime, the state case is not based only on the confession statements, reasonable doubt does not imply an absolute absence of doubt.
If the testimony of state experts is considered credible then the state does have a prima facie case against the accused because it corroborates the versions of witnesses who were in the house, Sizwe Zungu and others. Only DNA evidence appeared to be neutral in this case.
Mthobisi Mncube was linked to the crime scene by the scene bullets and witness descriptions. He was also placed at the Basotho hostel by cellphone records and Const Sizwe Zungu. The authenticity of his innocence will hinge on his performance under cross examination and the credibility of the witnesses who can verify his account.
LET ME ASK A QUESTION TO THOSE WHO BELIEVE THAT EVIDENCE WAS COOKED:
Out of the expert witnesses presented by the prosecution, which ones are you alleging provided false testimony and why?
