Tactics & Touchlines

Tactics & Touchlines Football analysis through a Mzansi lens. Tactical breakdowns, pre & post-match insights, match analysis, player profiles and analysis pieces.

He put in a decent performance, one marked by a handful of useful, and a largely decisive contribution in winning the pe...
19/06/2026

He put in a decent performance, one marked by a handful of useful, and a largely decisive contribution in winning the penalty. He is the type of player naturally inclined to take initiative, engage defenders directly and inject a degree of unpredictability into attacking sequences.

His presence gave Bafana added vitality down the right flank and helped the team gain territorial advantage in that corridor. There were moments where he had his marker retreating and backpedalling, unsure whether to engage or contain him. That ability to unsettle defenders and force them onto the back foot remains one of his most valuable attributes.

Yet the enduring frustration with Maseko's game remains unchanged. For all the qualities that make him such a dangerous attacking outlet, he can be remarkably careless in possession. He is often clumsy on the ball and prone to surrendering it in situations where better security and composure are required.

In many ways, his greatest strength is also his greatest weakness. The same adventurousness, directness and willingness to take risks that make him capable of creating moments of danger can also lead to unnecessary turnovers and breakdowns in possession. It is a delicate balance between encouraging his attacking instincts and demanding greater refinement in his decision-making.

What makes it particularly notable is that this has been a recurring theme throughout his rise. Having watched him over the past three seasons, the profile remains largely the same: a player with genuine attacking threat, capable of changing the complexion of a game, yet still carrying the same technical and decision-making shortcomings that have prevented him from taking the next step. The talent is evident; the challenge remains turning that rawness into consistent productivity.

This was a marked improvement from Bafana Bafana, especially the second half performance. The passing combinations becam...
18/06/2026

This was a marked improvement from Bafana Bafana, especially the second half performance. The passing combinations became far more fluid, the exchanges sharper, and there was a noticeable increase in the team's ability to play through the lines. They looked far more comfortable receiving and operating in pockets of space, which immediately gave their attacks greater rhythm and purpose.

What stood out most was the improved territorial control. Bafana were able to gain ground, sustain possession higher up the pitch and spend longer periods in the opposition's half. Rather than circulating the ball harmlessly in deeper areas, they began advancing play with conviction and finding players between the lines.

The passing sequences also carried more clarity. There was better movement ahead of the ball, better support around the ball carrier and a greater willingness to combine in tight spaces. As a result, the team looked more threatening and capable of unsettling Czechia's defensive structure.

For large spells of the half, Bafana were able to establish themselves deep in the opponent's territory, exchanging passes with confidence and composure. It was a much more proactive display, one that reflected greater attacking ambition and a clearer understanding of how they wanted to progress the ball.

Whether it was a tactical adjustment (bringing on Rele), improved ex*****on or simply a rise in intensity, the difference was evident. The second half looked far more like a side trying to impose itself on the game rather than merely just playing.

We've found it extremely difficult to play through Czechia's organisation and defensive structure. Time and again, Bafan...
18/06/2026

We've found it extremely difficult to play through Czechia's organisation and defensive structure. Time and again, Bafana have been forced to recycle possession all the way back to Ronwen Williams and start again, almost as if searching for a new route through a block that has been exceptionally compact and disciplined.

What has impressed me about Czechia is how quickly they recover their shape in defensive transitions. The moment possession is lost, they retreat into their half with numbers behind the ball, making central progression very difficult. Their block has been one of the game's defining features and has largely nullified Bafana's attempts to play through the middle.

As a result, they've effectively forced us into wide areas. The problem is that the next action is often a whipped cross into the box, and that plays directly into Czechia's strengths. With their height, physicality and aerial dominance, those deliveries are becoming routine clearances. We have a relatively compact lone striker up against towering centre-backs, making it an unfavourable battle.

Modiba, in particular, looks too eager to deliver early crosses when perhaps the better option would be to remain patient and try to play through or between the lines on the ground. The spaces are not out wide; they are in the moments before the final pass, if we can manipulate the structure enough to access them.

It's also why I felt Evidence Makgopa would have been the more suitable profile for this match. Rayners is struggling to play with his back to goal and hold off physically imposing defenders. Makgopa's frame, strength and ability to occupy centre-backs would have given Bafana a different outlet. In a game where direct duels and physical contests matter, his profile may have been better equipped to handle what Czechia are asking of our striker.

I would have personally loved to see Relebohile Mofokeng assume the central attacking midfield role, particularly with M...
18/06/2026

I would have personally loved to see Relebohile Mofokeng assume the central attacking midfield role, particularly with Mshishi unavailable through suspension. He is arguably the closest natural No.10 profile in the squad and possesses the imagination, creativity and unpredictability to operate between the lines.

That said, the midfield axis selected by Hugo Broos suggests a preference for balance, structure and control rather than a conventional playmaker. Perhaps there are different dynamics and movements planned that aren't immediately obvious on paper. It will be interesting to see what the combination of Tebza x Mbatha & Adams has in store and whether they can provide enough creativity from central areas while maintaining the structural stability Broos clearly values.

Bafana Bafana's starting XI has been announced and Hugo Broos has returned to a back four. The midfield remains stylisti...
18/06/2026

Bafana Bafana's starting XI has been announced and Hugo Broos has returned to a back four. The midfield remains stylistically similar to the one used in the previous outing, but you'd expect Jayden Adams to be the player tasked with providing the connective tissue between midfield and attack. He should have greater licence to advance, shape attacking sequences and offer creative influence from central areas. I don't expect him to operate as a traditional No.10, but rather as a hybrid No.8/No.10; a midfielder capable of contributing to build-up while also arriving in advanced zones. It will be interesting to see how he interprets and executes that role.

Thapelo Maseko and Oswin Appollis occupying the wide areas, and that could be a significant avenue for Bafana. Both possess the pace, acceleration and explosiveness to stretch defences and attack space aggressively.

One of the things that stood out when Czechia faced South Korea was how uncomfortable they looked whenever they were forced to defend against speed in transition and direct running from wide areas. South Korea repeatedly exposed them with quick attacks, and Bafana will be hoping Maseko and Appollis can replicate some of those dynamics. If they can isolate defenders in one-v-one situations and attack the spaces behind the full-backs, there is certainly potential to cause problems.

The midfield, however, still leans heavily towards structural stability and reinforcement. On paper, all the profiles are essentially central midfielders, which should provide control, compactness and balance. The intriguing question is whether they can still offer something different through their movement patterns, role interpretation and the specific instructions given by Broos. Sometimes a midfield's dynamics are determined less by the positions listed on the teamsheet and more by how individuals occupy space once the game begins.

My preference would be Oswin Appollis on one side, a toss-up between Tshepang Moremi and Thapelo Maseko on the other, an...
18/06/2026

My preference would be Oswin Appollis on one side, a toss-up between Tshepang Moremi and Thapelo Maseko on the other, and Evidence Makgopa leading the line.

I know Makgopa will not be the most popular choice. In a game where Bafana are likely to need goals, many will naturally gravitate towards profiles perceived as more clinical or naturally gifted finishers.

But my reasoning goes beyond pure goalscoring. Czechia's footballing identity is built around physicality, aerial dominance and winning duels. Against that type of opponent, I find myself leaning towards the profile of Makgopa.

He gives you relentless pressing from the front, the ability to compete physically with centre-backs and a willingness to contest aerial balls. He is not easily bullied and can make life uncomfortable for defenders over ninety minutes.

Just as importantly, when Bafana need an outlet, Makgopa can occupy defenders, protect the ball and bring others into play. He provides a platform for transitions, allows runners to join attacks and can help progress possession when the team is under pressure.

That does not mean he is the complete solution to Bafana's attacking problems. But stylistically, I think he is the striker best suited to the demands of this particular match.

Against Czechia, Bafana will need more than just a finisher. They will need a forward capable of fighting, stretching the defence, linking play and helping the team gain territory. For me, that points towards Evidence Makgopa.

For me, it is very much a toss-up between Ime Okon and Olwethu Makhanya. From the glimpses I have seen, they profile qui...
18/06/2026

For me, it is very much a toss-up between Ime Okon and Olwethu Makhanya. From the glimpses I have seen, they profile quite similarly. Both are composed on the ball, comfortable in possession, technically clean and capable of contributing to build-up play rather than merely surviving defensive phases.

Most importantly for this particular opponent, both bring aerial presence. Czechia's game is heavily influenced by physicality, set-pieces and aerial contests. They possess the height, frame and aggression to dominate in those situations, so having defenders capable of matching that threat becomes especially valuable.

That is where Mbokazi presents an interesting dilemma. There will undoubtedly be moments where he comes up against a physical mismatch in the air. Yet, in my view, he remains arguably Bafana's best centre-back and therefore cannot be left out of the side.

Personally, if I were selecting purely with Czechia's strengths in mind, I could make a case for starting both Okon and Makhanya because of their height and aerial prowess. But football is never that simple.

Mbokazi gives you too much elsewhere. He dominates ground duels, thrives in one-versus-one situations, covers large spaces when defending, possesses an excellent passing range and is comfortable stepping into advanced areas to influence play. Then there is the added weapon of his long-range shooting, which can alter matches in an instant.

That is why, despite my reservations about a back three, I would not be instinctively opposed to one that included all three defenders. At least then Bafana could benefit from the aerial qualities of Okon and Makhanya while still retaining the all-round influence of Mbokazi.

The broader point, however, is that I do not think Bafana should become overly consumed by Czechia's strengths. There is a fine line between respecting an opponent and building your entire approach around neutralising them. The objective should be to strike a balance: acknowledging Czechia's aerial threat while still maximising Bafana's own qualities rather than merely reacting to the opposition.

I think we can all agree that there is nothing inherently wrong with a 3-5-2. Formations, in isolation, are neither good...
18/06/2026

I think we can all agree that there is nothing inherently wrong with a 3-5-2. Formations, in isolation, are neither good nor bad. What ultimately determines their success is the personnel selected, the combinations and partnerships within them, and, perhaps most importantly, how the coach instructs players to interpret and execute their roles.

My reservations with Hugo Broos' use of the system have never really been about the shape itself. They have been more about the profiles chosen within it and how the structure functions collectively.

For example, I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to a 3-5-2 against Czechia if the back three consisted of Mbekezeli Mbokazi, Ime Okon and Olwethu Makhanya. The latter two, in particular, possess the physical presence, aerial dominance and defensive attributes that would be valuable against a Czech side traditionally known for its strength in the air and set-piece threat.

That said, it still wouldn't be my preferred setup. I'm merely saying that if Broos were determined to go down that route, there are personnel combinations that would make the system far more convincing and better suited to the specific demands of this encounter.

The first thing that must change is the back five.There is nothing inherently wrong with a three-centre-back system. The...
18/06/2026

The first thing that must change is the back five.

There is nothing inherently wrong with a three-centre-back system. The issue has never been the formation itself, but rather how Hugo Broos has constructed it, the profiles he selects within it and the combinations and partnerships he trusts. At some point, results have to inform the discussion, and the reality is that Bafana are yet to truly convince, let alone win, with a three-man central defence.

The second thing that needs to change is the level of conviction and attacking ambition. The circumstances now demand it. Bafana probably need a victory, while Czechia, having lost their opening match, will also enter the contest needing a positive result. That should create a more ambitious game than the one against Mexico.

I also believe Czechia are far more vulnerable to pace and explosiveness in transition. That is why natural wingers become so important for this fixture. Bafana need players capable of stretching the game, carrying the ball into space and forcing defenders to turn and run towards their own goal.

That does not necessarily mean relying on traditional wing play and endless deliveries into the box. In fact, that could play directly into Czechia's hands. Their defenders are physically imposing and dominant aerially, making crosses little more than comfortable meals for their backline.

Instead, width should be used as a tool to create space. Wingers should stretch the pitch, isolate defenders and then combine infield, either through underlapping runs, quick combinations or attacks through the half-spaces and central corridors.

Most importantly, Bafana need to approach this game with the belief that it is there to be won. Organisation and defensive discipline remain important, but they cannot once again come at the expense of attacking threat. The balance has to shift. The occasion now demands it.

I get the sense that Czechia, if the sentiments emerging from their camp are anything to go by, may have slightly mispro...
17/06/2026

I get the sense that Czechia, if the sentiments emerging from their camp are anything to go by, may have slightly misprofiled Bafana Bafana. The interesting question is whether that misreading could ultimately work to Bafana Bafana’s advantage.

There appears to be an assumption that Bafana embody the stereotypical African football identity: a side built primarily on physicality, power and athletic dominance. But that description doesn't quite fit this generation of South African footballers. In fact, compared to many of our African counterparts, Bafana are neither imposing in stature nor reliant on overwhelming physical superiority. Many of our key players are relatively diminutive, compact and technically inclined.

What this team does possess, however, is pace, acceleration and explosiveness in transition. If Czechia have prepared for a battle of physical attrition, they may be vulnerable to a different type of threat altogether. Players such as Tshepang Moremi, Thapelo Maseko, Oswin Appollis and Mike Mamosha have the ability to stretch defensive structures, attack space aggressively and punish teams that are caught expecting something else.

More importantly, Bafana's footballing identity is not rooted in brute force. It is built on technical security, ball retention, combination play and intelligent movement. Hugo Broos' side generally seeks to control moments through possession, structure and tactical organisation rather than through sheer physical confrontation.

That is why I wonder whether Czechia have done enough homework. There is a danger in approaching Bafana Bafana through outdated assumptions about African football. This is not a side that wants to overpower opponents physically; it is a side that wants to outplay them technically and exploit them through movement, speed and intelligent use of the ball.

And if Czechia have indeed prepared for the wrong version of Bafana Bafana, Hugo Broos' men would be wise to expose that misunderstanding before they have time to adjust. Because in tournament football, even the slightest miscalculation in profiling an opponent can prove costly.

Address

F2181 Indlulamithi Circle Ntuzuma
Durban
4360

Telephone

+27697889409

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Tactics & Touchlines posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category