12/10/2025
This is a raw defense of Jacob Zuma, built on the idea that he was the only leader who truly acted for the poor. The speaker argues that while Zuma's critics obsess over the multi-million rand Nkandla scandal, they ignore his life-and-death achievements. The core example given is his rapid rollout of antiretroviral drugs to combat HIV, reversing the deadly denialism of the previous administration. In this view, Zuma is a flawed but decisive leader who saved countless lives when others turned their backs.
But let's not pretend this is the whole story. The speaker dismisses the "nine wasted years" and corruption allegations, framing them as a smear campaign by a hostile, "white-owned" media. To counter the narrative of Nkandla's excess, they point to the colossal, and largely unaccounted for, 600 billion Rand that vanished during the COVID pandemic under the current government. It's a classic political tactic: deflecting from one scandal by highlighting an even bigger one under your opponents, arguing that the criticism of Zuma is selective and racially biased.
The message ends by making a sharp distinction between Zuma the man and the MK party, which it paints as a sophisticated collective of brilliant minds. This is the emotional plea: this isn't about blindly following one man, but about choosing a side. The speaker has chosen to stand with the poor, and they frame the current fear of the MK party by the ruling alliance as proof that they are the real threat to a system that, in their view, has abandoned the people who need help the most.