28/08/2025
The EFF’s policy on Africa is one of the most progressive. It has the potential to open up countless opportunities for South Africas and Africans as a whole. With the vast wealth beneath our soil, the world would inevitably come and kneel before us.
However, the EFF must strike a balance between being a vanguard of the poor in South Africa and a true Pan-Africanist movement. At the same time, the party should be mindful of its choice of words for public relations purposes. For example, instead of using the term “borderless,” it would be more effective to say: “We are fighting for a United States of Africa with one army, one president, and one passport that allows Africans to freely travel across all African countries.” This way, the concern about documentation—often raised by critics—is directly addressed through the concept of “one passport.”
The problem is that many people do not read deeply and tend to associate the word “borderless” with “lawlessness.”
Another important point to clarify is that the EFF is not suggesting that everyone must unite inside South Africa. Rather, the vision is for all African governments to dissolve, paving the way for democratic elections to choose a single president of Africa.
When it comes to jobs, prioritising locals is non-negotiable. For instance, if you look for work in the Eastern Cape and you are from KwaZulu-Natal, Eastern Cape residents will be prioritised. Similarly, if you are from Zimbabwe and apply for work in South Africa, South Africans will naturally be prioritised. Simple!
