03/11/2025
Into Magaya’s R**e Scandals
The name Walter Magaya has not left the headlines for years — but the surge of fresh complaints, the revival of old dockets and the renewed attention of gender justice watchdogs has re-ignited one of Zimbabwe’s most polarising and emotionally loaded questions:
What exactly lies inside the long-running r**e allegations orbiting the PHD Ministries leader?
This timeline compiles the publicly reported allegations, legal moves, withdrawals and institutional actions tied to Prophet Walter Magaya and Prophetic Healing and Deliverance (PHD) Ministries. It’s drawn from court records, press reports and statements by the Zimbabwe Gender Commission and the Zimbabwe Republic Police. Where possible we note complainant status and the official outcome so far. Many items remain allegations in law; we report them as such.
2013 — Parents allege Magaya r**ed and impregnated their then-17-year-old adopted daughter
What was reported: In 2013 the parents of a young woman said Magaya had r**ed and impregnated their then-17-year-old daughter, a claim that drew public attention and media coverage. The parents made the allegation publicly; the young woman later released a video in which she dismissed some of her parents’ claims.
2016 (August–November) — R**e accusation, fresh police attention, then withdrawal
What was reported: A woman lodged a complaint accusing Magaya of r**e and the matter received national coverage in 2016. The complainant later withdrew the allegation and publicly said she feared for her life; the withdrawal was widely reported and prompted debate about intimidation and recantation in high-profile cases.
2018–2019 — Continued public allegations and Gender Commission interest
What was reported: Through 2018–2019 further accusations and public complaints surfaced; civic groups called for inquiries and the Zimbabwe Gender Commission began to show sustained interest. The Commission signalled it was monitoring and, at times, investigating various complaints and publicised concern about alleged sexual exploitation by the PHD leader.
2021 — Magaya v Zimbabwe Gender Commission (Court action by Magaya to block investigation)
What was reported: Magaya launched court challenges to stop the Gender Commission’s investigations into allegations of sexual abuse; the case (Magaya v Zimbabwe Gender Commission, case number 105 of 2021) reached the courts and the litigation is part of the public record (showing his attempt to restrain investigations).
October 2022 — Zimbabwe Gender Commission relaunches investigations; invites victims to come forward
What was reported: The ZGC announced it would recommence investigations into allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse by Walter Magaya and publicly invited survivors to submit information to the Commission as part of a formal probe. The move followed years of public complaints and prior attempts to investigate.
2019–2022 (ongoing) — Public pattern: allegations, withdrawals, counter-claims
What was reported: Across this period multiple public allegations, occasional recantations, and claims by both accusers and supporters created a patchwork of contested public statements. Some alleged victims recanted or published videos saying they had not been abused; advocacy groups warned about intimidation and the chilling effect on reporting. The pattern complicated prosecutorial and civil-society responses.
November 1–2, 2025 — Police arrest Walter Magaya on multiple r**e and fraud reports
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
What was reported: The Zimbabwe Republic Police confirmed the arrest of Walter Magaya in a dawn operation in relation to several reports of r**e and alleged fraud. Major national outlets reported the arrest and police issued a statement confirming he was taken into custody as detectives processed multiple reports. (Note: this is an active criminal matter; charging decisions, indictments and any trial schedules are matters for the prosecuting authorities.)
Some complainants have remained publicly on record (i.e., statements made to police and/or to the Gender Commission).
Some complainants later withdrew or recanted public allegations, sometimes saying they were pressured or threatened; others state their initial statements were misconstrued. These withdrawals are part of the public record and have been highlighted in news reporting.
Court filings & institutional actions — summary
Court litigation: Magaya mounted legal challenges seeking to stop or limit the Gender Commission’s investigations (Magaya v ZGC, 2021). Those filings are in court records and reflect a legal strategy to contest investigatory steps.
Zimbabwe Gender Commission: Formally announced the recommencement of investigations (Oct 2022) and publicly invited victims to report.
Police: On multiple occasions police were reported to have investigated complaints; in November 2025 the ZRP publicly confirmed Magaya’s arrest in relation to several reports.
What remains unresolved
There is no single definitive public judgment resolving all allegations across the long span of claims — many matters are at various stages: some never proceeded to public trials; some were withdrawn by complainants; some were subject to legal challenge; and some (as of November 2025) are the subject of active police action.
The patchwork nature of complaints, withdrawals, legal moves and institutional probes means the public record remains incomplete.
© ZiMetro News
