Umoja.TV Channel

Umoja.TV Channel Our mission at UmojaTV is to connect people through interactive & factual content!

Zimbabwe High Court Orders Buy-Out as Borrowdale Divorcees’ Mansion Dispute Reaches CourtUmoja.TV Channel A long-running...
21/08/2026

Zimbabwe High Court Orders Buy-Out as Borrowdale Divorcees’ Mansion Dispute Reaches Court

Umoja.TV Channel
A long-running living arrangement that saw a Zimbabwean divorcing couple occupy separate sections of their upmarket Borrowdale home is set to come to an end after the High Court ordered the former husband to surrender his share of the property to his ex-wife.

The couple, identified in court papers as Tafadzwa Adelaide Mwale and Isaacs Yesake Mwale, had continued living under the same roof in their nine-bedroom Philadelphia, Borrowdale mansion, with Tafadzwa occupying the upper floor while Isaacs lived downstairs.
Tafadzwa approached the High Court seeking authority to buy out her former husband's interest in the property, maintaining that she had carried the greater financial burden in acquiring and developing the house.
The property was purchased in August 2017 for US$68,000 and was registered in both their names. At the time of the proceedings, US$34,438.27 remained outstanding to the developer.
According to Tafadzwa's submissions, she obtained a US$25,000 StanChart Bank loan towards the purchase and subsequently financed much of the construction of the nine-bedroom residence through additional borrowing and proceeds realised from the sale of her CBZ shares.
She argued that her financial contribution substantially outweighed that of her former husband and initially sought recognition of a 95 percent interest in the property.
Isaacs, a former transport officer at ZESA Headquarters who has been unemployed since December 2019, disputed the extent of his former wife's claim.
While acknowledging that she had contributed more in monetary terms, he maintained that he was entitled to at least half of the property.
He told the court that the house was intended to be his retirement home, particularly after he had disposed of properties in Chinhoyi, Gweru, Norton and Mutare to meet the family's school-fee obligations.
Isaacs also pointed to substantial material and other contributions towards construction, saying he supplied 80,000 bricks, stones and 30 tonnes of cement for the foundation. He further produced quotations relating to timber, tiles, solar equipment and gutters.
He claimed that more than US$40,000 had been deposited into the couple's joint account during the marriage, but said he was unable to obtain historical bank statements because the bank had demanded US$500 to retrieve records dating back to 2017.
He also told the court that, as the couple's self-described "treasurer", his wife had retained invoices and other financial records, while he had discarded his own documents.
Isaacs further argued that his contribution to the marriage extended beyond direct cash payments. Among the factors he relied upon was a ZESA electricity benefit which he said his former wife continued to enjoy, as well as his broader contribution to the household during their more than 13 years of marriage.
Court rejects equal split
In her judgment, Justice Phillipa Phillips granted the divorce and considered how the property should be divided in light of the parties' respective contributions and circumstances.
The court noted that although property registered jointly in the names of spouses carries a presumption of equal ownership, that presumption is not absolute.
In terms of section 7 of the Matrimonial Causes Act, the court is required to consider issues of justice and equity, including the parties' respective contributions and their future needs.
Justice Phillips found that simply giving Isaacs an equal share would not necessarily produce a fair outcome.
The judge also considered the practical consequences of awarding him a share that he might struggle to sustain, while recognising that Tafadzwa would suffer greater financial prejudice if she were required to accommodate a larger share for her former husband.
However, the court also rejected Tafadzwa's proposed 95 percent entitlement, finding that a 5 percent share for Isaacs would be unduly low, particularly given the length of the marriage and his contributions to the property and household.
The court ultimately settled on an 80:20 division, awarding Tafadzwa 80 percent of the property and Isaacs the remaining 20 percent.
The husband was initially assessed as having a 30 percent interest, but the court reduced this by 10 percentage points after taking into account the outstanding liability on the property. Tafadzwa will assume responsibility for settling the US$34,438.27 still owed to the developer.
Six months to complete buy-out
The court directed that the property be valued by an estate agent mutually agreed upon by the parties within 10 working days. Should they fail to agree on an estate agent, the Registrar will appoint one.
Following the valuation, Tafadzwa will have six months to purchase Isaacs' 20 percent interest in the property.
Isaacs has been ordered to sign all documents necessary to facilitate the transfer. Should he fail to cooperate, the Sheriff will be empowered to execute the required documentation on his behalf.
The court further directed that each party bear their own legal costs.
The ruling effectively brings to an end the unusual arrangement under which the former spouses continued occupying different floors of the same matrimonial mansion despite their divorce proceedings, with the property now set to be consolidated under Tafadzwa's ownership once the buy-out is completed.

🇿🇲 ZAMBIA: THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKENZambia has concluded its 2026 General Election, with President Hakainde Hichilema secur...
18/08/2026

🇿🇲 ZAMBIA: THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN
Zambia has concluded its 2026 General Election, with President Hakainde Hichilema securing a second term after receiving approximately 61% of the presidential vote.
Beyond the numbers, however, the most significant moment may be what comes next: reconciliation, unity and development.
In his post-election message, President Hichilema extended an olive branch even to those who voted against him:
“To those citizens who preferred the ideas presented by our opponents, we hear you…”
That perhaps captures one of the most important responsibilities of leadership after an election — to govern not only for those who voted for you, but for the entire nation.
With the campaign behind them, Zambia now faces the bigger task of turning political victory into tangible development, economic opportunity and improved lives for ordinary citizens.
One Zambia. One Nation. One People. 🇿🇲
Congratulations to the people of Zambia on the conclusion of their electoral process.


MUNDUBILE TAKES EARLY LEAD IN SAMPLED ZAMBIA PRESIDENTIAL RESULTSEarly tallied results from 22 polling stations across Z...
14/08/2026

MUNDUBILE TAKES EARLY LEAD IN SAMPLED ZAMBIA PRESIDENTIAL RESULTS

Early tallied results from 22 polling stations across Zambia show Brian Mundubile leading the presidential race with 7,238 votes, ahead of Hakainde Hichilema with 5,786 votes.

According to provisional results compiled from constituencies including Kabushi, Siavonga, Lusaka Central, Mazabuka, and State House, Mundubile leads by a margin of 1,452 votes

The Breakdown
From a total of 13,024 votes counted so far:
1. Brian Mundubile – 7,238 votes — 55.57%
2. Hakainde Hichilema – 5,786 votes — 44.43%

Mundubile recorded his strongest showing in Kabushi Kamutema; Stream with 3,367 votes, while Hichilema’s best result came from Siavonga; Kariba Primary with 1,057 votes

Other notable results include Hichilema leading in Kalomo South with 527 votes and State House with 381 votes. Mundubile also posted strong numbers in Kanchibiya with 695 votes and Chipangali West with 481 votes.

What it means
The early figures suggest a tight contest, with Mundubile currently ahead in more polling stations. However, with results still streaming in from across the country, the final outcome remains open.

Political analysts note that turnout and margins in urban centers like Lusaka, Livingstone, and Solwezi will be key to determining the winner.

This report is based on provisional results from selected polling stations and does not represent final national results.




One school of thought emerging from the ongoing anti-immigrant protests in South Africa argues that the silence of many ...
05/07/2026

One school of thought emerging from the ongoing anti-immigrant protests in South Africa argues that the silence of many prominent Zimbabwean figures is not merely diplomatic caution but a reflection of personal and economic interests.
According to this perspective, many senior government officials, politically connected individuals, and influential businesspeople have significant investments in South Africa. These range from residential and commercial properties to company shareholdings, business partnerships, bank accounts, and other financial interests. South Africa has long served as a regional economic hub where many Zimbabwean elites have established assets and business networks. As a result, they may be reluctant to make public statements that could be interpreted as hostile toward South Africa or its citizens, fearing that doing so could jeopardize their investments, relationships, or future opportunities. Supporters of this view argue that maintaining silence is, for them, a strategy to safeguard their long-term interests rather than engage in emotionally charged public debates.
The same argument has also been extended to Zimbabwe's entertainment industry. Critics point out that many musicians—both secular and gospel—have largely refrained from issuing strong public condemnations of the attacks or expressing visible solidarity with Zimbabweans affected by the unrest. Those who hold this view argue that South Africa remains one of the most lucrative markets for Zimbabwean artists, offering larger audiences, higher-paying performances, recording opportunities, collaborations, and greater exposure than many other destinations in the region.
From this perspective, openly criticizing South Africa or appearing to side against South African audiences could carry professional risks. Concert promoters might become hesitant to book them, audiences could react negatively, and future touring opportunities might diminish. Consequently, critics argue that some artists may choose to prioritize preserving access to this important market over publicly defending fellow Zimbabweans facing xenophobic violence or displacement.
Supporters of this school of thought therefore contend that economic self-interest has become a stronger influence than public advocacy. They argue that the calculation is simple: protecting careers, investments, and future opportunities takes precedence over making statements that could provoke backlash in a country that represents a significant source of income.
However, this interpretation remains one of several possible explanations. Others argue that silence may instead reflect diplomatic sensitivity, concerns about inflaming tensions, security considerations, or a belief that private engagement behind the scenes is more effective than public condemnation. Without direct statements from the individuals concerned, it is not possible to conclusively determine their motivations.

03/07/2026

😔 May this driver live

02/07/2026

Whatever happened to him, we pray that he survives....his wife and kids need him ❤️

30/06/2026

South African gospel musician Ayanda Ntanzi has reportedly declared his support for the ongoing protests, arguing that his loyalty lies first with the South Africans who embraced his ministry long before audiences from Zimbabwe, Botswana, Lesotho and other neighbouring countries discovered his music. He is quoted as saying, "Before Zimbabwe, Botswana and Lesotho, it was South Africa who came to my shows."
His remarks have sparked debate across the region. While gratitude to one's primary supporters is understandable, critics argue that such a position risks overlooking an important reality. The very foreigners who today find themselves caught in the crossfire of anti-immigrant sentiment were also among those filling concert venues, purchasing albums, streaming his music and inviting him to minister at churches throughout South Africa. Many Zimbabweans, Malawians, Mozambicans and other African nationals living in South Africa have faithfully supported local gospel artists for years. Their contributions helped sustain ministries and music careers that now enjoy continental recognition.

This raises an uncomfortable question: Can an artist celebrate the financial and spiritual support of immigrant audiences during prosperous times, yet remain silent—or appear indifferent—when those same supporters face fear, intimidation and uncertainty?
Equally striking is the silence from many of Zimbabwe's biggest musical names. Gospel and secular artists alike have come under increasing criticism for failing to publicly acknowledge the plight of Zimbabweans affected by the protests. Artists such as Alick Macheso , Jah Prayzah , Winky D DiBigman , Charles Charamba , Minister Michael Mahendere , Takesure Zamar and Everton Mlalazi ( among others) have, at least publicly, offered little in the way of messages of encouragement or solidarity.
For many Zimbabweans living in South Africa, this silence is painful. These are the same fans who have travelled hundreds of kilometres to attend concerts, bought tickets, promoted albums, and stood by these artists throughout their careers. In moments of celebration, they were recognised as loyal supporters. Yet in a season of fear and displacement, many feel forgotten.
No one expects musicians to solve political crises. Nor should they be compelled to take partisan positions. But artists possess something governments often struggle to provide during times of distress: hope. A simple message calling for peace, compassion, dignity and the protection of innocent people would neither undermine diplomatic efforts nor inflame tensions. Instead, it could reassure frightened families that they have not been abandoned by the very voices they have supported for years.
The Zimbabwean government has largely adopted a cautious and diplomatic approach, prioritising engagement through official channels rather than public confrontation. While such restraint may be appropriate at the state level, public figures are not bound by the same diplomatic constraints. They have the unique ability to comfort communities without entering political battles.
History often judges influential voices not only by what they said during moments of crisis, but also by what they chose not to say. Silence can sometimes be interpreted as neutrality, but for those living through fear, silence may feel indistinguishable from absence.

Ultimately, this is bigger than South Africa or Zimbabwe. It is a question of shared humanity. The entertainment industry thrives because audiences believe in artists long before artists become household names. That relationship should not be measured only in ticket sales and streaming numbers. It should also be reflected in compassion when those same audiences find themselves at their most vulnerable.
If this is indeed a defining moment for Southern Africa, then perhaps it is also a defining moment for its artists. Their legacy will not rest solely on the songs they recorded or the stages they filled, but on whether they chose empathy over convenience when their supporters needed them most.

Is Africa Approaching a Regional Political and Economic Standoff Over South Africa?The recent wave of anti-immigration p...
30/06/2026

Is Africa Approaching a Regional Political and Economic Standoff Over South Africa?

The recent wave of anti-immigration protests in South Africa is increasingly taking on regional dimensions, with political, economic, and diplomatic repercussions beginning to emerge across Southern Africa.
Public anger in several African countries has been fuelled by reports of foreign nationals—particularly migrants from neighbouring states—being targeted or pressured to leave South Africa. While the South African government has repeatedly stated that its actions are aimed at addressing illegal immigration rather than targeting specific nationalities, public sentiment in neighbouring countries has become increasingly critical.

In Zimbabwe, the debate has spilled into the cultural sphere. Public pressure mounted against the scheduled performance of the South African music duo Mafikizolo at an Econet Zimbabwe concert. Critics argued that Zimbabwe should not be providing economic opportunities to South African entertainers while Zimbabwean nationals are allegedly facing hostility and uncertainty in South Africa. The controversy has transformed what would ordinarily have been an entertainment event into a symbolic political issue.

Elsewhere, reports and public discussions in Mozambique have suggested the possibility of restricting or disrupting the movement of South African freight vehicles through Mozambican transport corridors. If such measures were ever to be officially implemented, they could have significant consequences for regional trade. South Africa depends heavily on cross-border road networks connecting it to neighbouring countries, particularly transport corridors through Mozambique and Zimbabwe that facilitate the movement of imports and exports to major ports.
Should additional neighbouring states adopt similar measures, the dispute could evolve beyond immigration concerns into a broader regional economic confrontation. Such a development would affect supply chains, freight logistics, trade flows, investment confidence, and diplomatic relations throughout Southern Africa.

The situation therefore appears to be moving beyond isolated domestic protests. It increasingly carries the characteristics of a continental political issue capable of testing regional solidarity and the effectiveness of Africa's diplomatic institutions.

This raises an important question: Will African Heads of State intervene before tensions escalate further?
Regional and continental organisations—including the African Union (formerly the OAU), Southern African Development Community (SADC), Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), and the Pan-African Parliament—would ordinarily be expected to play important mediation and diplomatic roles should tensions continue to rise.

As matters currently stand, there has been no widely reported emergency summit convened by these major African institutions specifically to address the growing regional political tensions surrounding immigration, cross-border relations, and the potential economic consequences. Whether diplomacy moves quickly enough to prevent further escalation may determine whether this remains a temporary political dispute or develops into a broader regional crisis.

SADC
Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA)
South African Government

THE BIG QUESTION THAT NEEDS A BIG ASNWERWhy does South Africa direct her frustration toward fellow Africans seeking oppo...
22/06/2026

THE BIG QUESTION THAT NEEDS A BIG ASNWER
Why does South Africa direct her frustration toward fellow Africans seeking opportunities, while showing little appetite to challenge the economic dominance of some of the country's most influential business and political elites?

Africa is concerned when its sons and daughters become targets of hostility in South Africa. Yet much of the country's wealth, land, and economic power remains concentrated in the hands of individuals and institutions that emerged from colonial and apartheid-era structures.

Odugwu, Kaindu, Carolina & Matipa (not from The Polygamist Netflix ) are from Nigeria , Malawi, Mozambique & Zimbabwe respectively and are tagged "immigrants" despite having all documents and registered companies .....

But below is a list of some of the untouchable white settlers who are proudly recognized as South Africans and Jacinta Ngobese Zuma & Ngizwe Mchunu won't dare tell to "ABAHAMBE!

John Steenhuisen:
The former Leader of the Opposition and Minister of Agriculture. He is of British South African descent; his wealth consists of standard legislative and executive remuneration alongside accumulated real estate.

Helen Zille:
A prominent British-descended political figure who serves as the Federal Chairperson of the Democratic Alliance (DA) and previously held the post of Western Cape Premier. Her wealth comes from her long career in politics, journalism, and public speaking.

Pieter Groenewald:
Currently serving as the Minister of Correctional Services. An Afrikaner leader, he has a long political tenure, having previously led the Freedom Front Plus.

Dr. Leon Schreiber:
The Minister of Home Affairs. A prominent younger Afrikaner politician in the national cabinet, his net worth is primarily derived from his professional career in politics and academia rather than massive business holdings.

Justice Owen Rogers (British Heritage):
Permanent Judge of the Constitutional Court of South Africa (the country's highest court).He is an English-speaking South African jurist. He graduated from the University of Cape Town and served as a leading Senior Counsel at the Cape Bar.Note: He is highly regarded for his expertise in commercial, tax, and competition law.

Justice Katharine Savage (British Heritage):
Judge of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. An English-speaking South African jurist, she built a prominent legal career in the Western Cape. She has served extensively across the High Court, Labor Appeal Court, and Supreme Court of Appeal. She is one of the most recent permanent elevations to the Constitutional Court.

Justice Glenn Goosen (Dutch / Afrikaner Heritage):
Judge of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) (the second-highest court in South Africa). Born in the Eastern Cape, his surname reflects historic Dutch/Afrikaner settlement roots. He was an anti-apartheid human rights advocate before joining the bench. He served as a judge in the Eastern Cape Local Division before being permanently elevated to the Supreme Court of Appeal.

Who is going to tell these "WHITE FOREIGNERS" to (abahambe) leave SA ?

Can Mzansi split the difference between a WHITE foreigner & a BLACK foreigner ?

South African Government

Address

Mutare

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Umoja.TV Channel posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Umoja.TV Channel:

Shortcuts

Share

Category