Due Process Media

Due Process Media 📜 Constitutional education, transparency audits,
and holding public officials accountable. ⚖️

08/14/2026

Escalation at the Drive-Thru: Accountability, Resistance, or Protocol? 🍟🚔

During a high-stakes encounter in Kent, Washington, officers from the Kent Police Department located a suspect vehicle tied to an alleged DUI hit-and-run incident.

Bodycam footage from the scene shows the suspect repeatedly ignoring direct commands to stay away from his SUV, attempting to get back into the driver's side while insisting, "My son is in here." After the suspect continuously refused to comply, officers drew a taser and warned him he would be tased if he didn't get on the ground.

When he continued to stand his ground with his hands in his pockets, a team of four officers physically grabbed him, leading to a intense struggle where he was forcefully taken down to the pavement to be handcuffed.

A subsequent hospital blood draw ultimately confirmed the presence of alcohol in his system, and the driver was officially charged with DUI and Hit and Run.

While taking a impaired driver off the streets safeguards public safety, the presence of a minor child in the middle of a physical police takedown raises heavy questions about de-escalation, child trauma, and law enforcement tactics.

At Due Process Media, we focus heavily on accountability, transparency, and constitutional boundaries.

When a suspect resists but a child is trapped in the vehicle, how should the police balance public safety with minimizing trauma to the innocent?

🎬 Watch the full breakdown on our channel.

Do you believe the officers acted reasonably given the suspect's refusal to comply, or should they have used alternative de-escalation methods to protect the child's well-being?

Let’s hear your take below. 👇

08/12/2026

Tased Next to a Rolls-Royce 🚗⚡️

Viral footage captured on the streets of Miami, Florida shows City of Miami Police Department officers intervening in a heated confrontation involving an orange luxury coupe.

During the encounter, officers ordered a non-compliant individual to back away and get on the ground. When the individual refused to comply and resisted physical control, an officer deployed a Taser directly to the individual's back, bringing them to the pavement where officers applied handcuffs.

While law enforcement officers argue that drive-stun Taser deployments are essential tools to safely neutralize non-compliant suspects who resist physical restraint, critics contend that using pain compliance on non-violent, unarmed individuals escalates situations into excessive force.

At Due Process Media, we scrutinize police protocol, Fourth Amendment standards, and officer conduct to examine where legitimate law enforcement ends and excessive force begins.

🎬 Subscribe to Due Process Media today to join our exclusive subscriber group chat, unlock insider legal breakdowns, get merch discounts, and support our independent coverage!

Let’s hear your take below. 👇
Was this Taser deployment a completely justified use of force to gain compliance, or did officers cross the line into police brutality?

08/10/2026

K9 Deployments in Physical Arrests 🐕🚨

Bodycam footage captures an intense physical struggle where law enforcement officers deploy a Police K9 unit to apprehension a non-compliant suspect pinned against a vehicle.

As officers issue commands to "quit fighting" and demand the suspect "let go of my dog," the K9 latches on during the struggle. The encounter escalates rapidly as multiple officers attempt to gain physical control and secure the individual.

While police canines are trained to assist in apprehending resisting or fleeing individuals, K9 deployments frequently spark legal debate surrounding Fourth Amendment standards, force proportionality, and officer safety during close-quarters struggles.

At Due Process Media, we examine police protocol, bodycam evidence, and constitutional standards to evaluate how force is used during active arrests.

🎬 Subscribe to Due Process Media today to access our exclusive subscriber group chat, unlock insider legal breakdowns, and get member perks!

Let’s hear your take below. 👇
Do you believe K9 deployments during active physical struggles are necessary for officer safety, or do they increase the risk of unnecessary injury?

08/09/2026

U.S. Citizenship vs. State Nationality 🇺🇸📜

A growing online movement promotes claims that individuals can change their legal status by declaring themselves a "State National" or "Non-Citizen National" under Title 8 of the U.S. Code when applying for a passport.

Proponents of this theory claim that standard U.S. citizenship, created under the 14th Amendment, places individuals under federal jurisdiction, whereas claiming "national" status allegedly provides statutory immunity or exemption from certain government regulations and law enforcement authority.

However, federal courts and the U.S. Department of State consistently refute these arguments. Legally, under 8 U.S.C. § 1101, non-citizen nationality applies primarily to individuals born in outlying possessions of the United States, such as American Samoa and Swains Island. Courts across the nation routinely dismiss sovereign citizen status claims as legally frivolous.

🎬 Let’s hear your take below. 👇

Do you think theories regarding "sovereign citizenship" and "state nationality" stem from genuine misunderstandings of the 14th Amendment, or are they intentional attempts to bypass government jurisdiction?

Constitutional Limits vs. Legislative Power🏛️📜Standing before the iconic United States Capitol in Washington, D.C., we a...
08/08/2026

Constitutional Limits vs. Legislative Power🏛️📜

Standing before the iconic United States Capitol in Washington, D.C., we are reminded that Article I of the U.S. Constitution establishes the legislative branch—giving Congress the authority to enact laws, oversee federal agencies, and manage national policy.

Yet, the words of the Constitution—starting with "We the People"—serve as a strict blueprint designed to limit government overreach and protect individual liberties.

When statutory laws and federal agency actions clash with fundamental constitutional protections, transparency becomes our primary line of defense.

Holding elected officials accountable requires continuous public oversight, open records access, and an unyielding commitment to due process.

🎬 Let’s hear your take below. 👇

Do you feel the federal government currently respects constitutional limits on its authority, or has legislative and regulatory power expanded too far beyond its original intent?

🇺🇸

08/08/2026

Arkansas Traffic Stop Escalation: Professional Restraint or Excessive Force? 🚨🇺🇸

During a traffic stop near Manila, Arkansas, Arkansas State Police Trooper Moisses Arellano took 18-year-old Alisa N. Hackett to the ground and struck her in the face while attempting to place her into custody.

Dash camera footage captures Hackett repeatedly crying out, asking for help, and requesting to call her mother. After being struck, she stated, "You can't punch me in my face," to which Trooper Arellano responded, "Says who?" and threatened further force if she did not comply with orders to turn around.

Law enforcement encounters are expected to balance officer safety with tactical restraint, professionalism, and strict adherence to use-of-force standards. When routine traffic stops escalate to physical strikes against young individuals, it sparks vital debate regarding police conduct, accountability, and constitutional protections.

At Due Process Media, we scrutinize public records, bodycam footage, and legal boundaries to examine how law enforcement powers are exercised across the country.

🎬 Let’s hear your take below. 👇

Where do you draw the line between necessary compliance tactics and excessive use of force during roadside stops?

Join the Due Process Media community! 🤝⚖️We keep tabs on civil rights, public transparency, and institutional accountabi...
08/03/2026

Join the Due Process Media community! 🤝⚖️

We keep tabs on civil rights, public transparency, and institutional accountability. If you have raw footage of traffic stops, public audits, or law enforcement misconduct, DM us to submit your clips!

08/02/2026

Arresting a Disabled Veteran for Calling 911: Justice or System Failure? 🚨🇺🇸

Body camera footage and investigative reports reveal a troubling situation involving the Liberty County Sheriff's Office in Liberty County, Georgia, where deputies arrested 68-year-old Diane Gerrish—a fully disabled veteran living with Parkinson's disease.

Gerrish was charged with misuse or abuse of 911 after calling emergency dispatch over 100 times in a nine-month period. Calls were placed for basic physical assistance, such as adjusting her heater, reaching her water bottle, or accessing her medication during late hours.

While emergency systems are meant for life-threatening critical incidents, records show the Sheriff's Office contacted Adult Protective Services (APS) multiple times regarding her situation. Rather than finding a long-term social support solution, deputies ultimately lifted Gerrish from her bed, placed her into a wheelchair, and transported her to jail. She later pled guilty and received 12 months of probation, with strict conditions prohibiting non-emergency 911 calls.

At Due Process Media, we examine the intersection of law enforcement responsibility, constitutional rights, and public accountability. When community social safety nets fail vulnerable citizens, is criminalizing emergency calls the appropriate law enforcement response?

🎬 Let’s hear your take below. 👇

Do you believe law enforcement should criminalize non-emergency 911 calls from disabled individuals, or should local governments establish alternaesponse teams for social welfare needs?

Address

Kent, WA
98030, 98031, 98032, 98035, 98042, 98064, 98089

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Due Process Media posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share