Not So Politically Correct

02/03/2025

And just like that, Mexico folds to the tariff war after one day and comes to the negotiating table. This is what leadership looks like.

01/09/2025

I have a sneaking suspicion these California fires are some form of terrorism. Causing a disaster in California would be impacting to the economy at a very vulnerable time economically, domestically and geopolitically. Considering the insanity the last couple years have been, would it be even surprising?

01/09/2025

01/08/2025

I bet the people who had their homes burned to the ground totally feel better knowing the fire department is focused on equity and inclusion.

10/04/2023

Lol

10/02/2023

It'll be exciting when all the far left revolutionaries get to stop raging against the machine and finally relax in their communist utopia.

10/02/2023

Justified rebuke of journalism today. They have no interest in the truth if involved Biden or Democrats as a whole, for that matter.

"Comer is correct when he states that Hunter Biden's business dealings, if proven to be true, could negatively impact U.S. national security. It’s a possibility that journalists should acknowledge. And they should be willing (if not eager) to investigate, to find the truth and reveal it to the American people — whether it proves the truth of President Biden’s denials or of the Republicans’ accusations. Protecting or harming either political side should not be part of the equation."

Rather than doing their jobs, some journalists appear to be hindering news investigations out of an allegiance to Biden or the Democrats

02/12/2023

Newborns this week

09/13/2022

You could argue that we have a recession (although the current administration won't admit it), or you could say geopolitical issues are causing problems, or we're less energy independent with this administration because of their insistence on forcing us off of fossil fuels...but it's an election year and a critical one. I suspect the Biden administration is leveraging the Strategic oil reserve to keep public sentiment higher until after the election. Kind of feels like betting the farm to save a couple cows.

This year the Biden Administration has drawn down the Strategic Petroleum Reserve at the fastest rate in history. Here's what that means.

12/06/2021

Thoughts on the Supreme Court hearing arguments for the Mississippi Abortion case:

We live in an interesting time when our government is more divided than it has ever been. It's rare for both sides of the congressional isle to agree about anything. More often than not lately the policy and social battles are being fought at the state and local level and eventually trickling up to the supreme court - assuming they will take the case up. This is troubling because the purpose of the court is to interepret the law, not create it and congress has refused to bring up some of these hot button issues. They know it's politically toxic, so they avoid it, else they get an ear full from their constituents, or get hammered in the polls. It seems though that because of gridlock in the congressional branch and their refusal to do the hard thing, the fine line between interpretation and creation of law is becoming more and more blury with respect to the judicial branch. Why else has their been such a big focus on court cases and getting the right judges in place? It's where the battle is because Congress won't do it.

When situation like the Mississippi abortion case hit the public, battle lines are drawn and everyone runs to their respective political camp like it's a fire drill. No quarter is given and there is little space for pragmatism or common sense. The left wants their unhindered reproduction rights, dispite the rights claim on the right to life and the definition of what that life is. It's clear that both sides are biased and cherry-pick their definition of freedom for their own ends depending on the subject matter. Abortion and reproductive rights is a particularly difficult topic to find common ground on. For what it's worth, the left is correct in wanting a right to their body. However, the right is correct in wanting to protect the rights of the baby. The question is, should that right be unfettered or regulated? The problem is, both of those terms come with huge downsides. So what is the answer? Will this battle continue forever or will we ever find common ground and settle on a reasonable solution? Unlikely, Not until the left and right come together in good faith and learn to compromise and stop forcing a few people in black robes to begrudgingly seal the fate of unborn children instead of acting like 2 snotty siblings who can't seem to get along.