SCOTUS-Toons

05/15/2025

Trump v. CASA, Inc.
24A884. Does the Protecting Americans
From Foreign Adversary
Controlled Applications Act
violate the First Amendment?
Consolidated with Trump v. Washington (24A885) and Trump v. New Jersey (24A886)
This video was recorded live at https://www.youtube.com/live/eaejdoRDG9Q

02/08/2024

Trump v. Anderson | SCOTUS-Toons
23-719. Does Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment disqualify Donald Trump from holding the office of President of the United States and thus from appearing on Colorado’s 2024 presidential primary ballot?

10/09/2023

This week on SCOTUS-Toons!
The cartoon SCOTUS is taking Monday off but will hear two oral arguments on Tuesday and one on Wednesday. Watch at https://www.youtube.com/DanielLeeMeeks

Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC (22-660): Under 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, must a whistleblower prove his employer acted with “retaliatory intent” as part of his case in chief?

Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC (22-500): Is a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract unenforceable if enforcement would conflict with the “strong public policy” of the state whose law is displaced?

Alexander v. SC Conference of NAACP (22-807): Does the South Carolina legislature’s redistricting map, which has the effect of moving tens of thousands of Black voters to a different district, constitute an impermissible racial gerrymander, even if the legislators’ purported intent was merely a political gerrymander?

10/04/2023

Pulsifer v. United States (2023-10-02)
22-340. Must a defendant show he does not meet any of the criteria listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f) to qualify for a sentence lower than the statutory minimum?

10/03/2023

This week on SCOTUS-Toons!
The cartoon SCOTUS starts their 2023-2024 term with 3 oral arguments. Subscribe to https://www.youtube.com/ to be notified when new videos are posted.

Murray v. UBS Securities, LLC (22-660): Under 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, must a whistleblower prove his employer acted with "retaliatory intent" as part of his case in chief?

Great Lakes Insurance SE v. Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC (22-500): Does an ADA "tester" have Article III standing to challenge a hotel’s failure to provide disability accessibility information on its website, even if she has no plans to visit the hotel?

Alexander v. SC Conference of NAACP (22-807): Is a choice-of-law clause in a maritime contract unenforceable if enforcement would conflict with the "strong public policy" of the state whose law is displaced?

12/11/2022

21-476. Does application of the Colorado AntiDiscrimination Act to compel an artist to speak or stay silent violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment?

12/11/2022

NEW VIDEOS TODAY!
11:00 AM EST: Bartenwerfer v. Buckley
youtu.be/KB73rGxxaOE

12:15 PM EST: U.S., ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health
youtu.be/yExH_DvTNEk

1:45 PM EST: MOAC Mall Holdings v. Transform Holdco
youtu.be/HP2MhnrR6gw

10/13/2022

Arellano v. McDonough
21-432. Can the one-year filing deadline for veterans to submit disability claims after they are discharged be extended under principles of equitable tolling?

21-432. Can the one-year filing deadline for veterans to submit disability claims after they are discharged be extended under principles of equitable tollin...

10/12/2022

360° VR: Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
21-454. What is the proper test for determining whether wetlands are “waters of the United States” under the Clean Water Act?

10:00 AM: Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency (21-454)LIVE. What is the proper test for determining whether wetlands are “waters of the United States”...

10/11/2022

Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (Orig.145)
Arkansas v. Delaware (Orig.146)
Are unclaimed MoneyGram checks “money orders” or “similar written instruments” and thus subject to a federal law that remits them to the states where they were purchased?

Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin (Orig.145)Arkansas v. Delaware (Orig.146)Are unclaimed MoneyGram checks “money orders” or “similar written instruments...

10/10/2022

Merrill v. Milligan | SCOTUS-Toons (2022-10-04)
https://youtu.be/6Moyz3iZtb8
21-1086. Does Alabama’s 2021 redistricting plan for its seven U.S. House seats violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?

21-1086. Does Alabama’s 2021 redistricting plan for its seven U.S. House seats violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act?ABOUT SCOTUS-TOONS:The SCOTUS does...